IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v75y2019i4p1228-1239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing a confidence interval for the fraction who benefit from treatment, using randomized trial data

Author

Listed:
  • Emily J. Huang
  • Ethan X. Fang
  • Daniel F. Hanley
  • Michael Rosenblum

Abstract

The fraction who benefit from treatment is the proportion of patients whose potential outcome under treatment is better than that under control. Inference on this parameter is challenging since it is only partially identifiable, even in our context of a randomized trial. We propose a new method for constructing a confidence interval for the fraction, when the outcome is ordinal or binary. Our confidence interval procedure is pointwise consistent. It does not require any assumptions about the joint distribution of the potential outcomes, although it has the flexibility to incorporate various user‐defined assumptions. Our method is based on a stochastic optimization technique involving a second‐order, asymptotic approximation that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been applied to biomedical studies. This approximation leads to statistics that are solutions to quadratic programs, which can be computed efficiently using optimization tools. In simulation, our method attains the nominal coverage probability or higher, and can have narrower average width than competitor methods. We apply it to a trial of a new intervention for stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily J. Huang & Ethan X. Fang & Daniel F. Hanley & Michael Rosenblum, 2019. "Constructing a confidence interval for the fraction who benefit from treatment, using randomized trial data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 1228-1239, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:4:p:1228-1239
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:4:p:1228-1239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.