IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v75y2019i4p1205-1215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model selection for G‐estimation of dynamic treatment regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Michael P. Wallace
  • Erica E. M. Moodie
  • David A. Stephens

Abstract

Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) aim to formalize personalized medicine by tailoring treatment decisions to individual patient characteristics. G‐estimation for DTR identification targets the parameters of a structural nested mean model, known as the blip function, from which the optimal DTR is derived. Despite its potential, G‐estimation has not seen widespread use in the literature, owing in part to its often complex presentation and implementation, but also due to the necessity for correct specification of the blip. Using a quadratic approximation approach inspired by iteratively reweighted least squares, we derive a quasi‐likelihood function for G‐estimation within the DTR framework, and show how it can be used to form an information criterion for blip model selection. We outline the theoretical properties of this model selection criterion and demonstrate its application in a variety of simulation studies as well as in data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression study.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael P. Wallace & Erica E. M. Moodie & David A. Stephens, 2019. "Model selection for G‐estimation of dynamic treatment regimes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 1205-1215, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:4:p:1205-1215
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:75:y:2019:i:4:p:1205-1215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.