IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v72y2016i1p64-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantile regression analysis of censored longitudinal data with irregular outcome-dependent follow-up

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Sun
  • Limin Peng
  • Amita Manatunga
  • Michele Marcus

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="en"> In many observational longitudinal studies, the outcome of interest presents a skewed distribution, is subject to censoring due to detection limit or other reasons, and is observed at irregular times that may follow a outcome-dependent pattern. In this work, we consider quantile regression modeling of such longitudinal data, because quantile regression is generally robust in handling skewed and censored outcomes and is flexible to accommodate dynamic covariate-outcome relationships. Specifically, we study a longitudinal quantile regression model that specifies covariate effects on the marginal quantiles of the longitudinal outcome. Such a model is easy to interpret and can accommodate dynamic outcome profile changes over time. We propose estimation and inference procedures that can appropriately account for censoring and irregular outcome-dependent follow-up. Our proposals can be readily implemented based on existing software for quantile regression. We establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimator, including uniform consistency and weak convergence. Extensive simulations suggest good finite-sample performance of the new method. We also present an analysis of data from a long-term study of a population exposed to polybrominated biphenyls (PBB), which uncovers an inhomogeneous PBB elimination pattern that would not be detected by traditional longitudinal data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Sun & Limin Peng & Amita Manatunga & Michele Marcus, 2016. "Quantile regression analysis of censored longitudinal data with irregular outcome-dependent follow-up," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 64-73, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:72:y:2016:i:1:p:64-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:72:y:2016:i:1:p:64-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.