Author
Listed:
- Siobhan Dickinson
- Maryam Naghsh‐Nejad
- Kees Van Gool
- Jane Hall
Abstract
Research Question/Issue This study examines the impact of the Chronic Disease Dental Scheme (CDDS), introduced in 2007 to provide subsidised dental care for people with chronic conditions. Specifically, it asks whether the CDDS improved access to dental care among eligible women and what characteristics were associated with receiving higher rebates. Research Findings/Insights The analysis finds no statistically significant increase in dental visits among eligible women compared to ineligible women, despite the substantial fiscal outlay of the scheme. However, CDDS rebates were more likely to benefit women experiencing financial stress, those holding concession cards and those reporting poorer dental health. Conversely, women living in regional or remote areas received substantially lower rebate, underscoring persistent geographical inequities in access. Practitioner/Policy Implications The CDDS did not increase dental access overall but did provide financial relief to some disadvantaged groups, suggesting partial success in targeting need. Future dental policy must carefully weigh costs against outcomes and address equity challenges, particularly for rural and remote populations where service provision is limited. Methods Used The study employs a difference‐in‐differences approach using panel data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (1946–51 cohort) and linked Medicare claims, alongside a Heckman selection model. The analysis is causal in design with complementary descriptive insights.
Suggested Citation
Siobhan Dickinson & Maryam Naghsh‐Nejad & Kees Van Gool & Jane Hall, 2026.
"Did Subsidised Dental Care Improve Access? An Evaluation of the Chronic Disease Dental Scheme Among Australian Women With Chronic Conditions,"
Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 59(2), pages 190-207, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:59:y:2026:i:2:p:190-207
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8462.70058
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:59:y:2026:i:2:p:190-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mimelau.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.