IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecr/v59y2026i1p114-118.html

Australia's Specialist Fee Failure: Three Principles for a Way Forward

Author

Listed:
  • Yuting Zhang
  • Stephen Duckett
  • Charles Kemp

Abstract

Background Setting Medicare Schedule Fees for specialist services in Australia is a pressing challenge. As specialist charges increasingly exceed government rebates, rising out‐of‐pocket costs threaten the core objective of universal health care. Objective To define a fair fee structure that balances equitable compensation for highly trained professionals with affordable access for patients. To ensure that this balance is guided by three principles: sustainability (reflecting training and resource costs), quality (incentivizing high‐quality care) and accessibility (remains affordable and accessible for all patients). Methods This analysis evaluates the current system against three guiding principles: sustainability, quality and accessibility. We present criteria for assessing how well each principle is satisfied and discuss what specialist fees might look like if Australia followed each principle. Findings Australia's current system fails to meet all three principles. Recommendations We propose a three‐pillar reform strategy: 1. Regulated pricing: Set fair Medicare Schedule Fees and limit rebates to specialists who adhere to these fee standards. 2. Transparency: Mandate public reporting of specialists’ fees, quality indicators and waiting times. 3. Increase public capacity: Expand public sector capacity and general practitioner support to reduce reliance on private specialist care.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuting Zhang & Stephen Duckett & Charles Kemp, 2026. "Australia's Specialist Fee Failure: Three Principles for a Way Forward," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 59(1), pages 114-118, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:114-118
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8462.70045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.70045
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8462.70045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan J. Méndez & Jongsay Yong, 2026. "Affordable Specialist Care," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 59(1), pages 102-104, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecr:v:59:y:2026:i:1:p:114-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mimelau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.