IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v65y2026i1p16-29.html

Testing the Safe‐Haven Properties of Green Bonds, Gold, and Bitcoin for Traditional Bonds: A Wavelet Quantile Correlation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chi‐Wei Su
  • Yu‐Mei Ding
  • Kai‐Hua Wang
  • Xiao‐Qing Wang

Abstract

In this paper, the safe‐haven attributes of green bonds, gold, and bitcoin are compared to those of traditional bonds under various time periods and quantiles by using the WQC methodology. The results indicate that green bonds exhibited a stable safe‐haven function at longer time horizons during the full sample period, whereas other assets did not have safe‐haven features. During the COVID‐19 pandemic, bitcoin exhibited safe‐haven attributes at all time horizons, whereas gold demonstrated these characteristics over the short and medium terms. In the sample period during the Russia–Ukraine war, green bonds had strong safe‐haven properties at shorter and middle time horizons, whereas bitcoin had these properties at longer time spans. In this paper, a multivariate network framework that includes green bonds, gold, and bitcoin is constructed, and the theoretical foundations that influence the safe‐haven attributes of assets are detailed. In addition, this study clearly presents the safe‐haven effects of assets under various sample periods, time horizons, and quantiles, thereby bridging the gap of existing studies that ignore time frequency. Thus, this paper provides advice for investors, regulators, and policy‐makers, such as choosing portfolios on the basis of asset characteristics, monitoring asset disclosure, and encouraging the trading of safe‐haven assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi‐Wei Su & Yu‐Mei Ding & Kai‐Hua Wang & Xiao‐Qing Wang, 2026. "Testing the Safe‐Haven Properties of Green Bonds, Gold, and Bitcoin for Traditional Bonds: A Wavelet Quantile Correlation Approach," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(1), pages 16-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:65:y:2026:i:1:p:16-29
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.70007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.70007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8454.70007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:65:y:2026:i:1:p:16-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.