IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v64y2025i3p345-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There a Public Sector Wage Premium in Vietnam? New Evidence From the Vietnam Household Living Standard Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Van‐Phuc Phan
  • Martin O'Brien

Abstract

The identification of a public sector wage premium or penalty is of specific interest in fast and emerging economies, particularly those that have transitioned from state controlled to market economies. Using Vietnam as a case study, our initial descriptive statistics analysis showed that average hourly wage rates for public sector workers exceeded those for private sector workers from 2014 to 2020. However, after applying a propensity score matching (PSM) method and controlling for worker and job characteristics, remuneration for a public sector worker was between 17.6% and 27.8% lower than that for a private sector worker. Further exploration of this result revealed that the public sector employs a large proportion of university graduates; however, it pays a lower return to human capital compared to the private sector. The main policy implication from our findings is that the government is likely to face a public sector skills shortage in the future unless it significantly increases the returns to education in its remuneration policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Van‐Phuc Phan & Martin O'Brien, 2025. "Is There a Public Sector Wage Premium in Vietnam? New Evidence From the Vietnam Household Living Standard Survey," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 345-355, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:64:y:2025:i:3:p:345-355
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.12399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12399
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8454.12399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:64:y:2025:i:3:p:345-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.