IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v64y2025i3p309-319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Two‐Way Mixing Path Choice on Corporate Innovation‐A Quasi‐Natural Experiment From China

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Wan
  • Jia Zhao

Abstract

This study utilizes data from Chinese publicly listed companies between 2008 and 2020 and applies the PSM‐DID model to examine the impact of dual mixed‐ownership reform and the shift in relative control rights on corporate innovation, as well as the underlying mechanisms. The results indicate that mixed‐ownership reform significantly promotes corporate innovation, particularly enhancing innovation levels in state‐owned enterprises. This positive impact of mixed‐ownership reform on innovation is more pronounced in large state‐owned enterprises. Moreover, when private shareholders acquire relative control, the innovation effect of mixed‐ownership reform is amplified. The transfer of relative control rights in smaller private enterprises has an even greater positive effect on innovation. Further analysis reveals that market mechanisms can strengthen the innovation effect of mixed‐ownership reform in private enterprises and that such reforms also significantly improve corporate economic performance. Our findings are of great significance for the breakthrough of mixed ownership reform from “quantitative change” to “qualitative change” as well as for promoting reform through classification and stratification.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Wan & Jia Zhao, 2025. "The Impact of Two‐Way Mixing Path Choice on Corporate Innovation‐A Quasi‐Natural Experiment From China," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 309-319, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:64:y:2025:i:3:p:309-319
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.12395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12395
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8454.12395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:64:y:2025:i:3:p:309-319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.