IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v43y2004i3p340-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Robustness of Cartels Facilitated by Anti‐Dumping Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Noriko Ashiya

Abstract

This study formulates Prusa's (1992) theory that anti‐dumping regulations facilitate the formation of cartels between an exporter and import‐competing firms. It demonstrates that interest rates and product differentiation are two key factors that may determine the robustness of the cartels. It builds a Bertrand duopoly model with differentiated products that explains how anti‐dumping regulations might encourage the creation of cartels. To highlight the circumstances under which an import‐competing firm is seriously hurt by dumped exports, this study adopts the following setting. First, both the exporter and the import‐competing firms sell only in the home market. Second, if the exporter's product is sold at a cheaper price than the product of an import‐competing firm in the home market, this is a sufficient condition to initiate an anti‐dumping petition. Although the setting might also provide the circumstances under which the anti‐dumping authority could be over‐protecting the import‐competing firm, it makes it possible to view the exporter as a predator. Since the setting enables the exporter to be free from the need to make profits in its own market, it sets a lower price for its product only if it decides to undertake predatory activities against an import‐competing firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Noriko Ashiya, 2004. "The Robustness of Cartels Facilitated by Anti‐Dumping Regulations," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 340-356, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:43:y:2004:i:3:p:340-356
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8454.2004.00234.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2004.00234.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2004.00234.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:43:y:2004:i:3:p:340-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.