IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v41y2002i2p208-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Joint Test of the Rational Expectations‐Permanent Income Hypothesis under Seasonal Cointegration

Author

Listed:
  • Tai‐Hsin Huang

Abstract

This study re‐evaluates the validity of the joint rational expectations‐permanent income hypothesis under the framework of seasonal cointegration using seasonally unadjusted quarterly data from Austria, Canada and Taiwan. Evidence is found that the consumption change only depends on the innovations of the income and the unemployment rate changes, and that agents are rational in forming their expectations, i.e., the joint hypothesis is supported by the data used. However, with the same data set, a similar test based on non‐seasonal cointegration tends to reject the joint hypothesis, since the test ignores completely the possible stochastic seasonalities that may contain important information, as has been pointed out by Wallis (1974), embodied in the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Tai‐Hsin Huang, 2002. "A Joint Test of the Rational Expectations‐Permanent Income Hypothesis under Seasonal Cointegration," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 208-232, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:41:y:2002:i:2:p:208-232
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.00160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00160
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8454.00160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:41:y:2002:i:2:p:208-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.