IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v38y1999i2p91-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wage Effects on the Volume of Unpaid Work in Nuclear Australian Households

Author

Listed:
  • Ross A. Williams

Abstract

Using the 1992 Australian Time‐Use Survey, empirical estimates are obtained of the determinants of unpaid work in nuclear household by each adult. Eight types of unpaid work are examined. Wage rates and demographic variables are found to exert most influence on household time devoted to unpaid work. The strongest result is the negative effect of the female wage rate on unpaid work undertaken by females.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross A. Williams, 1999. "Wage Effects on the Volume of Unpaid Work in Nuclear Australian Households," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 91-105, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:38:y:1999:i:2:p:91-105
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8454.00044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8454.00044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. George Argyrous & Lyn Craig & Sara Rahman, 2017. "The Effect of a First Born Child on Work and Childcare Time Allocation: Pre-post Analysis of Australian Couples," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 831-851, March.
    2. Athary Janiso & Prakash Kumar Shukla & Bheemeshwar Reddy A, 2021. "What Explains Gender Gap in Unpaid Household and Care Work in India?," Papers 2106.15376, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    3. Sholeh A. Maani & Amy A. Cruickshank, 2010. "What Is The Effect Of Housework On The Market Wage, And Can It Explain The Gender Wage Gap?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 402-427, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:38:y:1999:i:2:p:91-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.