IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v36y2026i2p150-169.html

The Impact of Mandated Board Gender Diversity on Earnings Management: Evidence From California Senate Bill 826

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayu Sun
  • Xudong Tang
  • Han Bao
  • Pengdong Zhang

Abstract

Prior research on board gender diversity and earnings management yields mixed findings due to endogeneity concerns and institutional differences. This study exploits California's Senate Bill 826, the first mandatory board gender quota in the United States, as a regulatory shock to examine whether mandated board gender diversity is associated with accrual‐based earnings management. Using a difference‐in‐differences design, we find that firms subject to a binding SB 826 requirement increased female board representation and subsequently exhibited lower absolute discretionary accruals across three accrual models. The estimated reductions range from 21.0% to 24.2% of the sample mean. Cross‐sectional tests reveal stronger effects in firms with weaker prior governance and when new female directors have financial expertise. The study provides U.S.‐based quasi‐experimental evidence on reporting outcomes associated with mandated board gender diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayu Sun & Xudong Tang & Han Bao & Pengdong Zhang, 2026. "The Impact of Mandated Board Gender Diversity on Earnings Management: Evidence From California Senate Bill 826," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 36(2), pages 150-169, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:150-169
    DOI: 10.1111/auar.70024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.70024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/auar.70024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:36:y:2026:i:2:p:150-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.