IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiaps/v13y2026i1ne70069.html

Shanghai Co‐Operation Organisation: A Concert of Eurasia?

Author

Listed:
  • James MacHaffie

Abstract

The Shanghai Co‐operation Organisation (SCO) has emerged as a viable intergovernmental organisation with a vibrant security portfolio. With its recent expansion it now boasts ten members, including rising great powers Russia, China, and India, as well as nuclear‐armed Pakistan, and regional power Iran. However, the organisation is beset with internal inconsistencies and regional rivalries (Pakistan‐India, India‐China in particular) that may preclude its viability. Despite this, the SCO, led by China and Russia, has set itself up as a major counterweight to NATO and other security organisations in Eurasia. This article examines the feasibility of the SCO in forming its own concert of powers in Eurasia in the new multipolar system, with three powers—China, India, and Russia balancing in Eurasia. The research will feature a multi‐methods design, based on the aggregate capabilities model, and using statistical analysis of arms trading and defence budgets amongst the SCO powers, that will enhance the specific case studies. This includes examining what system‐ and unit‐level factors are pushing the member states towards a regional concert, including internal and external, and what unit‐level factors may, or will, prevent a concert from forming.

Suggested Citation

  • James MacHaffie, 2026. "Shanghai Co‐Operation Organisation: A Concert of Eurasia?," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:13:y:2026:i:1:n:e70069
    DOI: 10.1002/app5.70069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/app5.70069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christensen, Thomas J. & Snyder, Jack, 1990. "Chain gangs and passed bucks: predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 137-168, April.
    2. Hemmer, Christopher & Katzenstein, Peter J., 2002. "Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(3), pages 575-607, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivan Savic & Zachary C. Shirkey, 2009. "Trust in the Balance," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 21(4), pages 483-507, October.
    2. Nicolas Blarel, 2024. "Navigating US–China Rivalry in a Multi-aligned Middle East: Understanding India’s Shifting Strategy Towards the Region," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 11(4), pages 536-556, December.
    3. Choi Eun-Mi, 2010. "Memory Politics and International Relations in East Asia," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 63-79, June.
    4. Liam Campling & Elizabeth Havice, 2013. "Mainstreaming Environment and Development at the World Trade Organization? Fisheries Subsidies, the Politics of Rule-Making, and the Elusive ‘Triple Win’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(4), pages 835-852, April.
    5. Stephen Biddle & Stephen Long, 2004. "Democracy and Military Effectiveness," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 48(4), pages 525-546, August.
    6. Saori N. Katada, 2010. "Political Economy of East Asian Regional Integration and Cooperation," Working Papers id:3059, eSocialSciences.
    7. Zeev Maoz, 2009. "The Effects of Strategic and Economic Interdependence on International Conflict Across Levels of Analysis," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 223-240, January.
    8. Averell Schmidt, 2024. "Treaty withdrawal and the development of international law," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 785-808, October.
    9. Steve Chan & Richard W. Hu, 2015. "East Asia’s Enduring Rivalries: Ripe for Abatement?," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 2(2), pages 133-153, August.
    10. Matthew Fuhrmann, 2020. "When Do Leaders Free‐Ride? Business Experience and Contributions to Collective Defense," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 416-431, April.
    11. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Kaija Schilde, 2017. "European Military Capabilities: Enablers and Constraints on EU Power?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 37-53, January.
    12. Anja Jetschke, 2010. "Do Regional Organizations Travel? - European Integration, Diffusion and the Case of ASEAN," KFG Working Papers p0017, Free University Berlin.
    13. David L. Rousseau, 2002. "Motivations for Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 46(3), pages 394-426, June.
    14. Rajesh Rajagopalan & Varun Sahni, 2008. "India and the Great Powers," South Asian Survey, , vol. 15(1), pages 5-32, January.
    15. Neil Narang & Rupal N. Mehta, 2019. "The Unforeseen Consequences of Extended Deterrence: Moral Hazard in a Nuclear Client State," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(1), pages 218-250, January.
    16. Lluc López i Vidal, 2022. "Beyond the Gaiatsu Model: Japan’s Asia-Pacific Policy and Neoclassical Realism," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 9(1), pages 26-49, April.
    17. Michela Ceccorulli & Sonia Lucarelli, 2014. "Security Governance: making the concept fit for the analysis of a multipolar, global and regionalized world," RSCAS Working Papers 2014/41, European University Institute.
    18. Roman Hlatky & Joshua Landry, 2025. "Ethnic preferences, domestic audiences and military coalition formation," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 42(1), pages 32-55, January.
    19. Nam-Kook Kim, 2009. "European experience for East Asian integration: ideas, national interests, and the international circumstance," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 295-312, June.
    20. John A. C. Conybeare, 1994. "Arms Versus Alliances," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 38(2), pages 215-235, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:13:y:2026:i:1:n:e70069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2050-2680 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.