IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiaps/v13y2026i1ne70063.html

Alliance Politics in the 21st Century Great Power Competition: A Power‐Balancing Coalition Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Brian C. H. Fong

Abstract

US‐China competition in the Indo‐Pacific is setting the stage for a new tale of alliance politics. To contain Beijingʼs expanding power and influence in the Indo‐Pacific, Washington is currently leading several coalitions, namely the US‐Japan Alliance, Quad, Squad, and AUKUS; To counter US balancing efforts, Beijing is now strengthening its own alliances especially the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the China‐Russia partnership. Using an integrative review approach, this article synergises the existing system‐ and unit‐level theories into a “Power‐Balancing Coalition Framework” (PBCF) for investigating the 21st century alliance politics. This framework hypothesises that system‐level forces (i.e., relative power distribution across states/blocs of states) will dispose countries to “behave similarly” in terms of engaging a power‐balancing coalition in a similar direction, on the one hand; it also hypothesises that unit‐level forces (i.e., stateʼs geopolitical position, political‐economic systems, and ideology) will domestically shape states to drive countries to “behave differently” in terms of engaging a power‐balancing coalition in a different pace, on the other hand. Such a framework has the potential to shed light on state alliance behaviours not only in the Indo‐Pacific but also all over the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian C. H. Fong, 2026. "Alliance Politics in the 21st Century Great Power Competition: A Power‐Balancing Coalition Framework," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:13:y:2026:i:1:n:e70063
    DOI: 10.1002/app5.70063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/app5.70063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:13:y:2026:i:1:n:e70063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2050-2680 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.