IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiaps/v12y2025i3ne70049.html

Public Management of Health Expenditures in Response to COVID‐19 and Traditional Infectious Diseases: The Korean Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Seungwon Yu
  • Yeonwoo Sim
  • Namkuk Lee
  • Suhee Kim

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness, allocative efficiency, and crowding‐out effects of health expenditures in response to traditional infectious diseases and the COVID‐19 pandemic. Through theoretical analysis and empirical data from Korean local governments, employing a two‐way fixed effects model, we derive several key findings. First, social insurance health expenditures were significantly effective in controlling both traditional infectious diseases and COVID‐19, whereas general government health expenditures were not. Second, allocative efficiency, the principle of allocating more resources where needed, was not observed in the response to traditional infectious diseases but was significant in the COVID‐19 response. Third, we identified a crowding‐out effect where increased health expenditures for COVID‐19 reduced funds for traditional infectious disease responses. These findings offer strategic insights for Asia‐Pacific countries in optimising health resource allocation and budget management amidst evolving health crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Seungwon Yu & Yeonwoo Sim & Namkuk Lee & Suhee Kim, 2025. "Public Management of Health Expenditures in Response to COVID‐19 and Traditional Infectious Diseases: The Korean Experience," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:12:y:2025:i:3:n:e70049
    DOI: 10.1002/app5.70049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70049
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/app5.70049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freya M Shearer & Robert Moss & Jodie McVernon & Joshua V Ross & James M McCaw, 2020. "Infectious disease pandemic planning and response: Incorporating decision analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Tom Kompas & R Quentin Grafton & Tuong Nhu Che & Long Chu & James Camac, 2021. "Health and economic costs of early and delayed suppression and the unmitigated spread of COVID-19: The case of Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Rajkumar, Andrew Sunil & Swaroop, Vinaya, 2008. "Public spending and outcomes: Does governance matter?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 96-111, April.
    4. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    5. Blankart, Carl Rudolf, 2012. "Does healthcare infrastructure have an impact on delay in diagnosis and survival?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 128-137.
    6. Kwon, Hyeok Yong, 2005. "Targeting Public Spending in a New Democracy: Evidence from South Korea," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 321-341, April.
    7. Rema Hanna & Benjamin A. Olken, 2018. "Universal Basic Incomes vs. Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Developing Countries," NBER Working Papers 24939, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Colleen M. Grogan & Elizabeth Rigby, 2009. "Federalism, Partisan Politics, and Shifting Support for State Flexibility: The Case of the U.S. State Children's Health Insurance Program," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 39(1), pages 47-69, Winter.
    9. AlÌcia Adserý, 2003. "Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 445-490, October.
    10. Petretto, Alessandro, 1999. "Optimal social health insurance with supplementary private insurance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 727-745, December.
    11. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Mike Paulden & Christopher McCabe & Jonathan Karnon, 2014. "Achieving Allocative Efficiency in Healthcare: Nice in Theory, not so NICE in Practice?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 315-318, April.
    13. Parkhurst, Justin O & Lush, Louisiana, 2004. "The political environment of HIV: lessons from a comparison of Uganda and South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(9), pages 1913-1924, November.
    14. Leung, T.Y. & Sharma, Piyush & Adithipyangkul, Pattarin & Hosie, Peter, 2020. "Gender equity and public health outcomes: The COVID-19 experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 193-198.
    15. Bernet, Patrick M. & Gumus, Gulcin & Vishwasrao, Sharmila, 2018. "Effectiveness of public health spending on infant mortality in Florida, 2001–2014," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 31-38.
    16. Simon Eckermann & Brita Pekarsky, 2014. "Can the Real Opportunity Cost Stand Up: Displaced Services, the Straw Man Outside the Room," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 319-325, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bradley, Ian, 2003. "The representative bettor, bet size, and prospect theory," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 409-413, March.
    2. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    3. Sweksha Srivastava & Abha Aggarwal, 2025. "The Efficiency Analysis and Ranking Employing Data Envelopment Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Incorporating Cumulative Prospect Theory," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 1-34, September.
    4. Robert Sugden, 2022. "Debiasing or regularisation? Two interpretations of the concept of ‘true preference’ in behavioural economics," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 765-784, April.
    5. Shoji, Isao & Kanehiro, Sumei, 2016. "Disposition effect as a behavioral trading activity elicited by investors' different risk preferences," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    6. Jonathan Meng & Feng Fu, 2020. "Understanding Gambling Behavior and Risk Attitudes Using Cryptocurrency-based Casino Blockchain Data," Papers 2008.05653, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    7. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    8. Jos'e Cl'audio do Nascimento, 2019. "Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation," Papers 1908.01709, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    9. Soo Hong Chew & Bin Miao & Songfa Zhong, 2023. "Ellsberg meets Keynes at an urn," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(3), pages 1133-1162, July.
    10. Paolo Crosetto & Antonio Filippin, 2013. "The “bomb” risk elicitation task," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 31-65, August.
    11. Leitner Johannes, 2006. "Monetary utility over coherent risk ratios," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1/2006), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Gerlinde Fellner & Matthias Sutter, 2009. "Causes, Consequences, and Cures of Myopic Loss Aversion – An Experimental Investigation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(537), pages 900-916, April.
    13. Arkes, Hal R. & Hirshleifer, David & Jiang, Danling & Lim, Sonya, 2008. "Reference point adaptation: Tests in the domain of security trading," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 67-81, January.
    14. Francesco GUALA, 2017. "Preferences: Neither Behavioural nor Mental," Departmental Working Papers 2017-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    15. Shang, Xuesong & Duan, Hebing & Lu, Jingyi, 2021. "Gambling versus investment: Lay theory and loss aversion," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Brock, J Michelle, 2018. "Inequality of opportunity, governance and individual beliefs," CEPR Discussion Papers 12636, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    17. Schade, Christian & Steul, Martina & Schröder, Andreas, 2002. "Starting points' effects on risk-taking behavior," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 2002,15, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    18. Matthias Seifert & Canan Ulu & Sreyaa Guha, 2023. "Decision Making Under Impending Regime Shifts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(10), pages 6165-6180, October.
    19. Kouwenhoven, Marco & de Jong, Gerard C. & Koster, Paul & van den Berg, Vincent A.C. & Verhoef, Erik T. & Bates, John & Warffemius, Pim M.J., 2014. "New values of time and reliability in passenger transport in The Netherlands," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 37-49.
    20. Bin Zou, 2017. "Optimal Investment In Hedge Funds Under Loss Aversion," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-32, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:12:y:2025:i:3:n:e70049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2050-2680 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.