IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/apacel/v39y2025i2p74-89.html

Do Fiscal Regimes Matter for Fiscal Sustainability in India?

Author

Listed:
  • Arjun
  • Bibhuti Ranjan Mishra

Abstract

Governments, economists, and policymakers in India have long been concerned about India's unsustainability of public debt. Therefore, the present study seeks fresh evidence of India's fiscal sustainability from 1980–81 to 2020–21. This study employs linear (model‐based) and three non‐linear models (quadratic, cubic, and kinked) to examine the fiscal sustainability in India. The regime changes are quantified using a ‘regime‐switching model‐based fiscal stability test’ that does not consider the linear fiscal response function method. The findings from the analysis point to a statistically significant fiscal sustainability outcome for the linear model but not for the non‐linear model. There is also the sign of a ‘regime‐switching’ fiscal rule in India from 1980–81 to 2020–21. The unsustainable fiscal regime has been identified only in three periods: 1983–84 to 1993–94, 2009–10 to 2012–13, and 2018–19 to 2020–21. For other periods, sustainable regimes are evident. The study finds that India's fiscal policy satisfies the ‘non‐Ponzi game condition’, as revealed by the regime‐specific reaction coefficients and the average periods of fiscal regimes. However, the country's long‐term fiscal sustainability has been jeopardised, as the debt‐stabilising condition is strictly violated. Regime‐based insensitivity, which results in an unsustainable fiscal regime lasting for more than 3 years, might expose the country to long‐term fiscal unsustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjun & Bibhuti Ranjan Mishra, 2025. "Do Fiscal Regimes Matter for Fiscal Sustainability in India?," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 39(2), pages 74-89, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:74-89
    DOI: 10.1111/apel.12444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12444
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apel.12444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:74-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.