IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/apacel/v39y2025i2p61-73.html

The Impact of State‐Owned Assets Supervision System Reform on the Performance of State‐Owned Enterprises: Evidence From the ‘Two Types of Companies’ Pilot Policy in China

Author

Listed:
  • Guangqian Ren
  • Man Jing
  • Li Liu

Abstract

Promoting the transformation of the state‐owned assets supervision system (SASS) from ‘managing assets’ to ‘managing capital’ is the key direction of the new round of state‐owned assets reform. This article takes the policy implementation of state‐owned capital investment and operation companies (‘two types of companies’) as a quasi‐natural experiment, selects Chinese A‐share listed state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) from 2009 to 2022 as the research sample, and investigates the impact of SASS reform on the performance of SOEs using a multi‐period difference‐in‐differences model. The results suggest that SASS reform can significantly improve the performance of SOEs. Mechanism analysis indicates that SASS reform enhances the performance of SOEs by weakening government intervention, increasing external pay gaps, and reducing agency costs. Heterogeneity analysis shows that SASS reform on the performance of SOEs is affected by the administrative levels, industry attributes, and external institutional environments. The performance‐enhancing effect of SASS reform is more significant in central SOEs, competitive SOEs, and SOEs with a better external institutional environment. The findings enrich the research on the economic consequences of SASS reform and the factors affecting the performance of SOEs, providing empirical evidence for deepening the reform of state‐owned capital and SOEs and promoting the high‐quality development of SOEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangqian Ren & Man Jing & Li Liu, 2025. "The Impact of State‐Owned Assets Supervision System Reform on the Performance of State‐Owned Enterprises: Evidence From the ‘Two Types of Companies’ Pilot Policy in China," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 39(2), pages 61-73, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:61-73
    DOI: 10.1111/apel.12442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12442
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apel.12442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ratnam Vijayakumaran, 2019. "Agency Costs, Ownership, and Internal Governance Mechanisms: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 133-154.
    2. Kin Lee & Baruch Lev & Gillian Yeo, 2008. "Executive pay dispersion, corporate governance, and firm performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 315-338, April.
    3. Bizjak, John M. & Lemmon, Michael L. & Naveen, Lalitha, 2008. "Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 152-168, November.
    4. Lin, Yongjia Rebecca & Fu, Xiaoqing Maggie, 2017. "Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 17-57.
    5. Zhang, Rongwu & Lin, Yanzhen & Zhang, Wenjia & Du, Jianjun, 2024. "Mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises and executive compensation stickiness: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Ratnam Vijayakumaran, 2019. "Agency Costs, Ownership, and Internal Governance Mechanisms: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 133-154, January.
    7. Chen, Ming & Chen, Chen, 2023. "Financial constraints alleviation: Why does state-owned share reduction in China promote firm performance?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    8. Xinge Feng & Weijie Luo & Yong Wang, 2023. "Economic policy uncertainty and firm performance: evidence from China," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 1476-1493, October.
    9. Yao, Shouyu & Pan, Yuying & Sensoy, Ahmet & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Cheng, Feiyang, 2021. "Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Seungwon Yu & Namryoung Lee, 2016. "Financial Crisis, Politically Connected CEOs, and the Performance of State-Owned Enterprises: Evidence from Korea," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(9), pages 2087-2099, September.
    11. Yang, Zhenbing & Shao, Shuai & Yang, Lili, 2021. "Unintended consequences of carbon regulation on the performance of SOEs in China: The role of technical efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Zhenqing Liu & Linjie Li & Zhibin Zhang, 2024. "Non‐state shareholder governance and technological innovations of state‐owned enterprises: The moderating effect of executive compensation incentives," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3886-3896, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustansar Hayat & Zulfiqar Ali & Basharat Khan & Ayesha Khero, 2024. "Economic Policy Uncertainty and Firm Performance in Pakistan," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(3), pages 92-101.
    2. Yasmine Souissi & Anis Jarboui, 2025. "Does Corporate Governance Shape the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Financial Distress in Large European Companies?," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 15(1), pages 57-82.
    3. Ji-Hyun Lee & Su-Yol Lee, 2022. "Effect of the Absence of Unethical Controlling Shareholders on Firm Value and the Moderating Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Saleh F.A. Khatib & Dewi Fariha Abdullah & Ali Shariff Kabara & Saddam A. Hazaea & Tamil Selvi Rajoo, 2020. "Does Debts have any Impact on Governance Bundle and Agency Costs? Over-Governance Hypothesis," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 384-396, July.
    5. Anh Huu Nguyen & Duong Thuy Doan & Linh Ha Nguyen, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Agency Cost: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Zhang, Shengling & Wu, Zihao & He, Yinan & Hao, Yu, 2022. "How does the green credit policy affect the technological innovation of enterprises? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Musaab Mousa & Judit Sági & Zoltán Zéman, 2021. "Brand and Firm Value: Evidence from Arab Emerging Markets," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    9. Ratnam Vijayakumaran, 2019. "Ownership Reform, State Ownership, Corporate Governance, and Agency Costs: The Case of Chinese Listed Companies," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(1), pages 91-104, June.
    10. Omar Al Farooque, 2021. "Agency-Linked Risk Management with Ownership and Board Sub-Committee Governance: Evidence from an OECD Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Ratnam Vijayakumaran & Sunitha Vijayakumaran, 2019. "Leverage, Debt Maturity and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(4), pages 491-506, May.
    12. Hongkang Xu & Rachana Kalelkar & Long Liu, 2024. "Top Management Team Incentive Dispersion and Managerial Efficiency," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 34(2), pages 156-177, June.
    13. Zhao, Xing & Li, Xiangqian & He, Zhuoyi & Shi, Ruoying, 2024. "The relationship between the acquisition of corporate credit and the gender of executives: Evidence from developing countries," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    14. Tan, Xiujie & Yan, Yaxue & Dong, Yuyang, 2022. "Peer effect in green credit induced green innovation: An empirical study from China's Green Credit Guidelines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Qiwen Dai & Ju He & Zhongyuan Guo & Yanqiao Zheng & Yue Zhang, 2025. "Green finance for sustainable development: analyzing the effects of green credit on high-polluting firms’ environmental performance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Deng, Yumiao & Fang, Mengmeng & Ma, Sichao & Wang, Fanzhi & Wu, Wanting, 2025. "The impact of bank FinTech on green credit allocation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Junhai Ma & Yuxin Liu & Liyan Geng, 2023. "Does green credit financing mode with cap‐and‐trade scheme really benefit all members?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 4173-4192, October.
    18. Chun-Wei Chen & Junxiong Zheng & Tin-Chang Chang & Muhammad Sadiq & Bushra Tufail, 2025. "Green finance policy and heavy pollution enterprises: a supply-chain and signal transmission of green credit policy for the environment—Vietnam perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 2317-2335, January.
    19. Zhang, Zuomin & Wu, Yingjue & Wang, Honglei, 2024. "Corporate financial fragility, R&D investment, and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PB).
    20. Colak, Gonul & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Loukopoulos, Panagiotis & Loukopoulos, Georgios, 2021. "Tournament incentives and IPO failure risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:61-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.