IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/apacel/v39y2025i2p104-121.html

The Cross‐Industry Contagion Network of Systemic Risk: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Limei Sun
  • Qing Shen
  • Xiaoqing Huang

Abstract

This study employs the Lasso–Granger algorithm, in combination with sliding window technology, to construct a dynamic directed complex network that captures the dynamics of systemic risk transmission between the financial industry and the real economy. By analysing the network's characteristic indicators among the banking, securities, and insurance sectors, we explore variations in systemic risk transmission across these three major financial sectors and the real economy. Additionally, the CONCOR algorithm is used to detect community structures within the complex network, enabling a dynamic assessment of these communities' attributes over time. The empirical results show that the ability of the insurance, banking, and securities sectors to receive systemic risk weakens progressively. The insurance sector has the strongest capacity to transmit systemic risk, whereas the banking sector has the weakest capacity to transmit systemic risk. The banking and insurance sectors exhibit similar role attributes in the process of systemic risk transmission. The risk transmission relationship between the real economy and the financial industry shows heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Limei Sun & Qing Shen & Xiaoqing Huang, 2025. "The Cross‐Industry Contagion Network of Systemic Risk: Evidence From China," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 39(2), pages 104-121, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:104-121
    DOI: 10.1111/apel.12446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12446
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apel.12446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:39:y:2025:i:2:p:104-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.