IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/apacel/v39y2025i1p188-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does investor sentiment enhance the impact of ESG ratings on firms' financial performance? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Qingyu Hu
  • Qi Wang

Abstract

Prior studies have explored the link between ESG ratings and firms' financial performance, but few have focused on its interplay with investor sentiment. This study examines how investor sentiment moderates the relationship between ESG ratings and financial performance. We use a fixed‐effect regression model applied to panel data from Chinese listed firms from 2011 to 2020. We find strong evidence that investor sentiment can reinforce the impact of ESG ratings on financial performance. We further investigate how investor sentiment moderates the relationships between the dimensions of ESG—environmental (E), social (S), and governance (G)—performance, and financial performance, respectively. Evidence shows that investor sentiment can enhance the negative impact of E on financial performance, while it enhances the positive impacts of S and G on financial performance. Our results are robust across various econometric techniques, including generalised‐least‐squares regression, first‐difference regression, and system‐generalised method of moments estimation. We provide insights for firm managers on leveraging investor sentiment to enhance ESG strategies to improve financial performance and offer implications for policymakers in crafting effective regulations that account for investor sentiment dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingyu Hu & Qi Wang, 2025. "Does investor sentiment enhance the impact of ESG ratings on firms' financial performance? Evidence from China," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 39(1), pages 188-215, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:188-215
    DOI: 10.1111/apel.12437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12437
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apel.12437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:39:y:2025:i:1:p:188-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678411 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.