IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/anzsta/v45y2003i2p181-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Balanced Incomplete Block Designs in Designing Randomized Response Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Narelle F. Smith
  • Deborah J. Street

Abstract

This paper investigates the block total response method proposed by Raghavarao and Federer for providing accurate estimates of the base rates of sensitive characteristics during surveys. It determines the best balanced incomplete block design to use to estimate the base rates for three, four, five and six sensitive attributes respectively, given a maximum total number of 13 questions. The estimates obtained from this method have smaller variance than estimates obtained using the similar, but more popular, unmatched count technique.

Suggested Citation

  • Narelle F. Smith & Deborah J. Street, 2003. "The Use of Balanced Incomplete Block Designs in Designing Randomized Response Surveys," Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, Australian Statistical Publishing Association Inc., vol. 45(2), pages 181-194, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:anzsta:v:45:y:2003:i:2:p:181-194
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-842X.00274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-842X.00274
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-842X.00274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Axel Christian Mühlbacher & Anika Kaczynski, 2021. "The Impact of Gastrointestinal Symptoms on Patients’ Well-Being: Best–Worst Scaling (BWS) to Prioritize Symptoms of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Score (GIS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:anzsta:v:45:y:2003:i:2:p:181-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1369-1473 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.