IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v97y2026i2p469-501.html

In for a penny: An empirical study of earthquake experience and non‐pharmaceutical intervention effectiveness in the Marche region

Author

Listed:
  • Vincenzo Alfano
  • Salvatore Capasso
  • Salvatore Ercolano

Abstract

This study investigates whether prior exposure to natural disasters influenced individual compliance with non‐pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), specifically lockdown measures, during the Corona Virus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Focusing on the Marche region of Italy, which experienced a severe earthquake in 2016, we exploit the randomness of both the earthquake and the pandemic to construct a natural experiment. Employing a quantitative methodology, including fixed effects and hybrid models, we analyse municipality‐level data to assess differential effects of lockdowns on the incidence of new COVID‐19 cases. Our findings reveal that municipalities affected by the earthquake exhibited significantly lower reductions in infection rates following the implementation of lockdowns compared to unaffected areas. This suggests that disaster exposure may reduce the effectiveness of NPIs, potentially due to psychological mechanisms, such as hedonic revaluation, risk substitution or post‐disaster fatigue. These results carry important policy implications, highlighting the need for tailored public health strategies that account for the behavioural legacies of traumatic events.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincenzo Alfano & Salvatore Capasso & Salvatore Ercolano, 2026. "In for a penny: An empirical study of earthquake experience and non‐pharmaceutical intervention effectiveness in the Marche region," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(2), pages 469-501, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:97:y:2026:i:2:p:469-501
    DOI: 10.1111/apce.70023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.70023
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apce.70023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:97:y:2026:i:2:p:469-501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.