IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v96y2025i2p225-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure of cooperative self‐regulation: An exploration of cooperative regulatory violations

Author

Listed:
  • Caleb M. Houston
  • Jennifer D. Hamrick

Abstract

Cooperative organizations are built on strong principles and values rooted in equity and social responsibility. However, we observe a group of cooperatives that have become embroiled in material legal violations. They egregiously commit 602 violations over 20 years related to the safety and just treatment of their members, employees, community, customers and the environment, with penalties for misconduct totalling $2.3 billion. This directly opposes the ideals espoused by cooperatives, and their susceptibility to misconduct challenges the assumption that cooperatives are immune to the ethical failures seen in public firms. We find that when government agencies bring enforcement actions against misconduct, it reduces future negative behaviour. We also find that some cooperatives make changes to the leaders who are present at the time of wrongdoing, and these cooperatives have a decrease in the severity of misconduct in the future. Collectively, these findings suggest that a number of cooperatives harm the groups they claim to serve but that government enforcement and cooperative disciplining carried out in response to regulatory violations can mitigate future misconduct.

Suggested Citation

  • Caleb M. Houston & Jennifer D. Hamrick, 2025. "Failure of cooperative self‐regulation: An exploration of cooperative regulatory violations," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(2), pages 225-256, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:96:y:2025:i:2:p:225-256
    DOI: 10.1111/apce.12498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12498
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apce.12498?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:96:y:2025:i:2:p:225-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.