IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v91y2020i1p29-53.html

Infrastructure Provision, Politics And Religion: Insights From Tunisia'S New Democracy

Author

Listed:
  • Maleke FOURATI
  • Antonio ESTACHE

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship between access to infrastructure services and support for religious parties based on the evidence produced by a recent democratic experience in Tunisia in which a religious political party, Ennahdha, governed from 2011 to 2014. The experience points to a complex relationship. In the 2011 election, areas with higher access are associated with higher support for Ennahdha than areas with lower access. In the 2014 election, however, infrastructure access is positively correlated with support for the party in areas where access had improved but negatively correlated with support for the party in areas that already had high access. A possible pragmatic general implication is that, to be politically competitive, religious parties, cannot bet solely on their religious commitment to provide basic services, including infrastructure, to the poor. They need to recognize the multiplicity of voter's concerns and their evolving agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Maleke FOURATI & Antonio ESTACHE, 2020. "Infrastructure Provision, Politics And Religion: Insights From Tunisia'S New Democracy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(1), pages 29-53, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:91:y:2020:i:1:p:29-53
    DOI: 10.1111/apce.12242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12242
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apce.12242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:91:y:2020:i:1:p:29-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.