IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v88y2017i3p369-402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual Health Organizations As Facilitators And/Or Barriers Towards The Successful Implementation Of Nhis In Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Augustine ADOMAH-AFARI

Abstract

There are many constraints to implementing comprehensive health insurance in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa. Mutual health organizations are under pressure to resolve the inadequacies, accordingly. The objective of this study is to explore the extent to which the mutual health organizations constitute facilitators and/or barriers to the successful implementation of the health insurance scheme nationwide. Data were gathered through interviews and review of literature. The findings of the empirical data were analyzed using theories of health seeking behaviour and reflexive communities. The findings of the paper suggest that the mutual health organizations are beneficial to their communities as they have broadened the understanding of the community members, regarding what the concept of health insurance was in Ghana, a country where it was a relatively new concept in public health financing and delivery. However, the paper also observes that the mutual health organizations are facing problems that are likely to affect sustainability overtime under a national health insurance scheme. Therefore, the need for continuous public education to sustain the enthusiasm among community members is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Augustine ADOMAH-AFARI, 2017. "Mutual Health Organizations As Facilitators And/Or Barriers Towards The Successful Implementation Of Nhis In Ghana," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(3), pages 369-402, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:88:y:2017:i:3:p:369-402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apce.2017.88.issue-3/issuetoc
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:88:y:2017:i:3:p:369-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.