IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/amedoc/v20y1969i4p339-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information science unlimited? … a position paper

Author

Listed:
  • Irving M. Klempner

Abstract

Discussions relating to the identification of courses and the development of curricula for the informationscience field cannot yield meaningful results unless the conceptual framework of the field is first delimited and its basic segments defined. Starting with the current ASIS definition of information science, an analysis is made of the rationale of current thinking relevant to the conceptual boundaries and intellectual content of the field. Information science is analyzed to be comprised of the segments of: (1) Conceptualization, (2) Storage/Transmission, and (3) Utilization. Two of the segments are shown to be based on subjective notions, which can be investigated, for the most part, through the employment of statistical and normative survey methodology. One of the segments is shown to be susceptible of the application of more rigorous research methodology capable of yielding empirical proof. Since all three segments form integral parts of the field, they need to be fully represented in the information science curriculum. The technologist as well as the humanist can make significant contributions to the growth and development of the informationscience field.

Suggested Citation

  • Irving M. Klempner, 1969. "Information science unlimited? … a position paper," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 339-343, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:20:y:1969:i:4:p:339-343
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630200413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630200413
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.4630200413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:20:y:1969:i:4:p:339-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.