IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/amedoc/v16y1965i3p163-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analogy between information retrieval and education

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence B. Heilprin
  • Frederick L. Goodman

Abstract

This work is presented as a challenge paper for a symposium on education for information science to be held by the American Documentation Institute in September, 1965. The paper suggests that both searching for information in a collection of stored messages and searching for information in the process of education have been subject to and shaped by one basic constraint—the very limited rates of flow of information into human sense channels. It is shown how information retrieval and education each have surmounted the same difficulty in the same way, by many‐1 homomorphic transformations on messages which greatly reduce their word (or bit) content while preserving certain minimum invariants which identify the messages. From the homomorphic reductions, sensing time has been reduced further by means of the equivalence classes derived from the “vocabularies” in which the reduced messages are recoded. A quantitative partial model of information retrieval (to be presented in greater detail elsewhere) is suggested as homomorphic with education. Some possible applications to education in general and to education for information science in particular are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence B. Heilprin & Frederick L. Goodman, 1965. "Analogy between information retrieval and education," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 163-169, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:16:y:1965:i:3:p:163-169
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090160303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160303
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.5090160303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:16:y:1965:i:3:p:163-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.