IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/amedoc/v16y1965i2p105-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comments on the 1964 ADI meeting

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos A. Cuadra

Abstract

A group of attendees and program participants was surveyed after the 1964 meeting of the American Documentation Institute to provide ideas and guidance for future ADI meetings. The responses indicated that attendees view the quality of the technical program as the key to a successful meeting; that a four‐day meeting length meets with wide approval; that, if carefully planned, concurrent plenary sessions might be acceptable; that improvements in scheduling are required to permit greater participation in Author Forums; and that conference proceedings greatly enhance the value of the meeting and should be distributed well before the meeting. The many suggestions and criticisms that were offered are being studied in relation to the next regular ADI meeting in 1966.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos A. Cuadra, 1965. "Comments on the 1964 ADI meeting," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(2), pages 105-112, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:16:y:1965:i:2:p:105-112
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090160211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160211
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.5090160211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:16:y:1965:i:2:p:105-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.