IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/amedoc/v14y1963i2p109-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of diary and interview techniques in evaluating a system for disseminating technical information

Author

Listed:
  • A. Resnick
  • C. B. Hensley

Abstract

Diary and interview techniques were employed to evaluate various aspects of a Selective Dissemination of Information (SDI) System introduced in the International Business Machines Research Center in Yorktown Heights, New York. The test population consisted of a representative stratified sample of IBM Research employees. The design of the experiment utilized three sets of matched subjects, two as test groups and one as a control group. All three groups were asked to keep, for a specified two‐week period, a diary of all readings that were relevant to their work interests. After the diary period, all subjects were interviewed with regard to their information‐gathering habits. The two test groups were then exposed to the SDI System for approximately ten weeks, while the control group received no exposure to the system. During the last two weeks of the subjects' exposure to the SDI System, all three groups were again asked to keep diaries of pertinent readings, and then all subjects were again interviewed. In utilizing this test‐retest situation, it was anticipated that any significant changes in the reading habits or information‐gathering techniques of the subjects could be detected and perhaps consequently related to the SDI System. An evaluation of the techniques employed is discussed, and some of the findings are compared to results of other research workers in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Resnick & C. B. Hensley, 1963. "The use of diary and interview techniques in evaluating a system for disseminating technical information," American Documentation, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 109-116, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:14:y:1963:i:2:p:109-116
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.5090140206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140206
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.5090140206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:14:y:1963:i:2:p:109-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.