IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v85y2026i1p97-111.html

Strategic Environmental R&D Cooperation Under Managerial Delegation Contracts: Sales Delegation Versus Environmental Delegation

Author

Listed:
  • Dongdong Li
  • Xinyue Fu
  • Zhaoxin Qi

Abstract

This paper develops a duopoly model to examine firms' environmental R&D cooperation strategy under managerial delegation, where firms can choose between sales or environmental delegation. The results show that under sales delegation, firms choose non‐cooperative environmental R&D when the efficiency of environmental R&D is low; otherwise, cooperative environmental R&D occurs. Under environmental delegation, firms choose non‐cooperative environmental R&D when the degree of technology spillover is relatively high and the efficiency of environmental R&D is relatively low, whereas cooperative environmental R&D is optimal when the efficiency of environmental R&D is relatively high. We also find that regardless of the environmental R&D cooperation strategy, sales delegation leads to higher social welfare compared to environmental delegation. Moreover, we show that both symmetric and asymmetric sales (environmental) delegation can be an equilibrium in an endogenous delegation choice game, depending on the technology spillover effect and the efficiency of environmental R&D. Finally, we extend the model to examine the robustness of the baseline results.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongdong Li & Xinyue Fu & Zhaoxin Qi, 2026. "Strategic Environmental R&D Cooperation Under Managerial Delegation Contracts: Sales Delegation Versus Environmental Delegation," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(1), pages 97-111, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:85:y:2026:i:1:p:97-111
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.70004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.70004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.70004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:85:y:2026:i:1:p:97-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.