IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v85y2026i1p149-162.html

The Optimal Risk Choice of Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D With Cross‐Ownership

Author

Listed:
  • Dongdong Li
  • Feiran Xu
  • Chenxuan Shang

Abstract

This paper develops a duopoly model to examine firms' optimal R&D risk choices under cooperative and non‐cooperative R&D with cross‐ownership. We find that firms adopt higher R&D risks in cooperative settings than in non‐cooperative ones. Moreover, equilibrium R&D risks increase with cross‐ownership, and a firm assumes higher risk when it holds a smaller equity stake in its competitor. Our results also reveal that the socially optimal R&D risk exceeds the private optimum. Under cooperative R&D, this risk gap widens as cross‐ownership rises, whereas in non‐cooperative R&D, its trend depends on product substitutability. Extending the model to unilateral ownership, we show that the firm partially owned by its competitor takes on higher R&D risk than the owning firm, though both assume lower risk compared to cross‐ownership. Finally, we demonstrate that R&D risk is higher under Bertrand competition than under Cournot competition. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the role of ownership structure in shaping firms' risk‐taking behaviors in R&D and offering new insights into the trade‐off between cooperation and competition in innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongdong Li & Feiran Xu & Chenxuan Shang, 2026. "The Optimal Risk Choice of Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D With Cross‐Ownership," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(1), pages 149-162, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:85:y:2026:i:1:p:149-162
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.70007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.70007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.70007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:85:y:2026:i:1:p:149-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.