IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v84y2025i5p781-796.html

Toward an Austro‐Libertarian Sociology

Author

Listed:
  • Alexis Sémanne

Abstract

Interventionism has become a defining feature of modern societies, shaping individual behavior, economic activity, and social norms through state regulations, subsidies, and collectivist ideologies. Despite its profound impact, sociology has largely failed to critically examine the dynamics of interventionism from a praxeological standpoint in recent sociological debates, leaving a significant gap in understanding how individuals and communities adapt to coercive environments. This article proposes a new framework for sociological inquiry rooted in libertarian and Austrian principles, drawing on the works of Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek, Murray Rothbard, and others. Building on the Austrian tradition's emphasis on human action and spontaneous order, this framework—termed Austro‐Libertarian Sociology, Modern Austrian Sociology, Sociology of Spontaneous Social Orders or Sociology of Natural Order—focuses on how voluntary cooperation and decentralized systems emerge despite state‐imposed constraints. The method is structured around five domains: the sociology of human action, free‐market capitalism, property rights, freedom of contract, and natural competition. Furthermore, 12 innovative concepts, including State Dependency Syndrome, Adaptive Agency, and Spontaneous Resistance Networks, are introduced to analyze the societal consequences of interventionism and the resilience of natural social orders. The article also calls for the modernization of Austrian sociology by incorporating empirical tools to enhance its relevance in public debates. By critiquing contemporary sociology's collectivist biases and proposing a renewed discipline, this work aims to establish a sociological subfield capable of addressing the interplay between state intervention and societal adaptation, fostering a deeper understanding of decentralized, voluntary cooperation in an increasingly regulated world.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexis Sémanne, 2025. "Toward an Austro‐Libertarian Sociology," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(5), pages 781-796, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:84:y:2025:i:5:p:781-796
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12630
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.12630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nikolai Wenzel, 2010. "From contract to mental model: Constitutional culture as a fact of the social sciences," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 55-78, March.
    2. Robert D. Cairns, 1985. "Rent Seeking, Deregulation and Regulatory Reform," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 11(3), pages 591-601, September.
    3. Mark Pennington, 2021. "Hayek on complexity, uncertainty and pandemic response," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 203-220, June.
    4. Mark Pennington, 2023. "Foucault and Hayek on public health and the road to serfdom," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 125-143, April.
    5. Alan Abramowitz & Jennifer McCoy, 2019. "United States: Racial Resentment, Negative Partisanship, and Polarization in Trump’s America," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 681(1), pages 137-156, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonas Herby & Lars Jonung & Steve H. Hanke, 2025. "Were COVID-19 lockdowns worth it? A meta-analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 337-367, June.
    2. Pavlik, Jamie Bologna & Jahan, Israt & Young, Andrew T., 2023. "Do longer constitutions corrupt?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Amanda K. Steele & Ira J. Roseman, 2022. "Appraisals Associated with Interpersonal Negative Emotions: What Distinguishes Anger, Contempt, Dislike, and Hatred?," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 34(2), pages 175-199, September.
    4. Darcy W. E. Allen & Chris Berg & Sinclair Davidson & Jason Potts, 2022. "On Coase and COVID-19," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 107-125, August.
    5. Justin Callais & Andrew T. Young, 2021. "Does constitutional entrenchment matter for economic freedom?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(4), pages 808-830, October.
    6. Wenzel Nikolai G., 2016. "Descartes, Rousseau, de Gaulle: France’s Constitutional Waltz of Plebiscitarian Caesarism," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 22(2), pages 191-211, December.
    7. Emily Chamlee-Wright & Joshua C. Hall, 2014. "Some brief syllabus advice for the young economist," Chapters, in: Franklin G. Mixon & Richard J. Cebula (ed.), New Developments in Economic Education, chapter 7, pages 76-87, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Mehmet Nazım Uygur & Selahaddin Bakan, 2025. "Agitation Strategies of Anti-immigrant: The Populist and Neoliberal Lens," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 813-840, June.
    9. Anthony Evans & Nikolai Wenzel, 2013. "A framework for the study of firms as constitutional orders," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 2-18, March.
    10. Niclas Berggren, 2026. "Mark Pennington, Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge and Freedom," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 206(3), pages 649-654, March.
    11. Mikayla Novak, 2025. "Social problems: implications for Virginia political economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 38(1), pages 15-36, March.
    12. Jordan Brensinger & Ramina Sotoudeh, 2022. "Party, Race, and Neutrality: Investigating the Interdependence of Attitudes toward Social Groups," American Sociological Review, , vol. 87(6), pages 1049-1093, December.
    13. Alexander W. Craig & Virgil Henry Storr, 2025. "Social capital facilitates emergent social learning," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 38(2), pages 109-130, June.
    14. Maxime Walder & Oliver Strijbis, 2022. "Negative Party Identification and the Use of Party Cues in the Direct Democratic Context," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 325-335.
    15. Pérez-Martínez, H. & Bauzá Mingueza, F. & Soriano-Paños, D. & Gómez-Gardeñes, J. & Floría, L.M., 2023. "Polarized opinion states in static networks driven by limited information horizons," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    16. Nikolai Wenzel, 2014. "Lessons from Constitutional Culture and the History of Constitutional Transfer: A Hope for Constitutionally Limited Government?," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 20(2), pages 213-226, May.
    17. Ilia Murtazashvili & Yang Zhou, 2024. "Complex externalities, pandemics, and public choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 201(3), pages 607-622, December.
    18. Falkenberg, Max & Cinelli, Matteo & Galeazzi, Alessandro & Bail, Christopher A. & Benito, Rosa & Bruns, Axel & Gruzd, Anatoliy & Lazer, David & Lee, Jae K. & McCoy, Jennifer, 2025. "Towards global equity in political polarization research," OSF Preprints 3wzfq_v1, Center for Open Science.
    19. Andrew T. Young, 2019. "How Austrians can contribute to constitutional political economy (and why they should)," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 281-293, December.
    20. Andrea Pettrachin & Leila Hadj Abdou, 2024. "Beyond evidence-based policymaking? Exploring knowledge formation and source effects in US migration policymaking," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 3-28, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:84:y:2025:i:5:p:781-796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.