IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v68y2009i1p181-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

6. No More Hiroshimas and Sharp Weapons

Author

Listed:
  • Keping Wang

Abstract

When it comes to rethinking the Hiroshima A‐bombing and its historical impact, there arise a number of approaches to be exercised from different perspectives related to the human condition and the current situation today. This essay presents two of them: a poetical reflection and a philosophical pondering that are characterized by either factual inquiry or empirical wisdom. The former is deplorably sentimental and unforgettable with regard to the deadliest mode of warfare that has ever occurred in human history. The philosophical pondering from a Taoist viewpoint is thought‐provoking and instructive with ongoing relevance to the problematic globe. Hence when the poet calls out “No More Hiroshimas,” we shall go ahead and appeal for “No More Wars,”“No More Sharp Weapons,” or “No More Excessive Forces.” However, what haunts the world all the time is constant warfare at varied scales here and there; and what worries us right now is the hard fact that some nations are presumably taking the risk of developing nuclear weapons on a starvation budget, for they think that they are under the threat and pressure of other countries armed with plenty of such mass‐destructive devices. They all seem to have neglected or obliterated the historical memory of Hiroshima as a symbol of the worst violence ever known to humankind.

Suggested Citation

  • Keping Wang, 2009. "6. No More Hiroshimas and Sharp Weapons," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 181-203, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:68:y:2009:i:1:p:181-203
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00620.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00620.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2008.00620.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:68:y:2009:i:1:p:181-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.