IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v66y2007i1p71-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3 Rethinking Global Justice from the Perspective of All Living Nature and What Difference it Makes

Author

Listed:
  • James P. Sterba

Abstract

. I begin this chapter with an account of what is deserved in human ethics, an ethics that assumes without argument that only humans, or rational agents, count morally. I then take up the question of whether nonhuman living beings are also deserving, and I answer it in the affirmative. Having established that all individual living beings, as well as ecosystems, are deserving, I go on to establish what it is that they deserve and then compare the requirements of global justice when only humans are taken into account with the requirements of global justice when all living beings are taken into account. I argue that the more adequate global justice that takes into account all living beings imposes some additional obligations on us that are absent from a less defensible human‐centered global justice, but not as many as one might initially think.

Suggested Citation

  • James P. Sterba, 2007. "3 Rethinking Global Justice from the Perspective of All Living Nature and What Difference it Makes," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(1), pages 71-86, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:66:y:2007:i:1:p:71-86
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00498.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00498.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00498.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:66:y:2007:i:1:p:71-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.