IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v51y1992i3p273-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Questioning the Traditional‐modern Dichotomy

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Kfufher

Abstract

Dichotomizing traditional versus modern societtes has become ax tomatic in some introductory tests on third would development Based on field observations and interviews in tow That villages, this assumption should be questioned The leadership in both villages had carried out several successful, locally designed and implemented development projects Data Collected on these villages is summarized by the following significant and common factors wihich contributed to the successful development described 1 Fstablished, respected, traditional leaders undertook development initratives, 2 Traditional value systems provided the rationale for development, 3 Self sustaining, con structive change happened gradully, 4 Over time people adopted practical suggestions and carried them out themselves to improve their daily lives 5 Directed by the village leadership, change was achieved with minimal outside help These factors show traditional values and practices can lead to constructive shange Fortunately, some theoretical work has broadened the definition of development to include a human centered approach which can include any improvement in the lives of local villagers An example is provided by Higgins and Higgins’concept of a unified approach

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Kfufher, 1992. "Questioning the Traditional‐modern Dichotomy," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 273-291, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:51:y:1992:i:3:p:273-291
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1992.tb03479.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1992.tb03479.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1992.tb03479.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:51:y:1992:i:3:p:273-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.