IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v51y1992i2p205-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatization Versus Groundwater Central Management

Author

Listed:
  • ThomasH Bruggink

Abstract

A group of free market natural resource economists argue that the current system of limited property rights for groundwater users should be replaced by a new system of freely transferable property rights This, they contend, would provide the more efficient allocation of groundwater resources and help alleviate the water scarcity problem in the United States Their case for privatization is critically appraised Groundwater hydrology, common property, contamination, and other third party effects are examined to determine the set of circumstances under which privatization would work best The following alternatives to the full privatization plan are also examined central management, legal reform, and “French style” privatized management of water systems

Suggested Citation

  • ThomasH Bruggink, 1992. "Privatization Versus Groundwater Central Management," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 205-222, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:51:y:1992:i:2:p:205-222
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1992.tb03348.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1992.tb03348.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1992.tb03348.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:51:y:1992:i:2:p:205-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.