IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v43y1984i4p451-454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Constitutionality of a Federal Net Wealth Tax

Author

Listed:
  • Richard W. Lindholm

Abstract

. Consideration of a Federal Net Wealth Tax would help settle the question of the scope and limits of the taxing powers of the United States Government. The confusion attending this, which has prevented the federal government from taxing land and kept state taxation of land too low to bean efficient allocator of this resource, can be clarified. The Constitution's Article I, Section VIII, gave the federal government power to levy taxes, duties, imports and excises, as “indirect” taxes, requiring only that the duties, imposts and excises be “uniform throughout the United States.” The 16th Amendment authorized a “direct” tax on “incomes, from whatever source derived.” The intent of the Founding Fathers—almost all large landholders—was to prevent the new federal government from using land as a tax base. But the distinction between the types of taxes lacks economic meaning. By making the base of a new tax the net wealth of taxpayers. Congress could obtain a Supreme Court test to end the confusion. If the Court, following precedent, required that land be excluded from the tax base, this would assure land as a tax base to the states and permit them to tax it in a way to end speculative withholding of tracts and sites and to bring about orderly development according to current need.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard W. Lindholm, 1984. "The Constitutionality of a Federal Net Wealth Tax," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 451-454, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:43:y:1984:i:4:p:451-454
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb01873.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb01873.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb01873.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:43:y:1984:i:4:p:451-454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.