IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v43y1984i1p19-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance: A Problem of Hierarchies and Self Interest

Author

Listed:
  • Edward E. Williams
  • M. Chapman Findlay

Abstract

. Any realistic theory of the firm must take into account the governing structure of the enterprise. Unfortunately, neoclassical economic theory ignores most of the problems associated with firm goal structures and the issue of corporate governance. We argue that shareholder wealth maximization under less than perfectly competitive conditions has serious normative deficiencies. From a positive point of view, it appears that shareholders have such a weak position with respect to governance that they have little influence upon goal structures as well. It is observed that directors rarely function in the idealized trusteeship capacity. Efforts by government to make corporations more “responsible” may involve nothing more than attempts to strengthen the public sector at the expense of the corporate and, hence, may not be in the interest of shareholders at all. With corporations subject to increased regulation and government controls, two questions emerge: First, who should control corporate diction making (The corporate governance question.) Second, what is the appropriate role of corporations in our society. (The corporate responsibility question.) Corporate governance refers to shareholders. Corporate responsibility refers to alleged responsibility of the corporation to something called the social needs of the community1

Suggested Citation

  • Edward E. Williams & M. Chapman Findlay, 1984. "Corporate Governance: A Problem of Hierarchies and Self Interest," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 19-36, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:43:y:1984:i:1:p:19-36
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb02220.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb02220.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb02220.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:43:y:1984:i:1:p:19-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.