IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v42y1983i1p1-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federal Water Resources Policy and Decision‐Making: Their Formulation Is Essentially a Political Process Conditioned by Government Structure and Needs

Author

Listed:
  • William Sander

Abstract

. The effects that politics, government structure, and economic standards have upon federal water resources planning are examined. Water resources policy decisions are treated as a product of political demands which, in turn, are examined as a product of the direct or indirect stakes, or perception thereof, in a policy. Government structure also affects decisions, since it affects political access and, subsequently, power as well as the administrative capacity of government. Economic standards, such as a requirement that water projects contribute to national economic development, arise within a political context. Formulation of federal water resources policy is essentially a political process that is conditioned to some extent by government structure and planning standards such as economic requirements. Thus, recommendations to improve the product of this process must take into account its essential nature. Examples are drawn from the western reclamation and water pollution experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • William Sander, 1983. "Federal Water Resources Policy and Decision‐Making: Their Formulation Is Essentially a Political Process Conditioned by Government Structure and Needs," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:42:y:1983:i:1:p:1-12
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1983.tb01684.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1983.tb01684.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1983.tb01684.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:42:y:1983:i:1:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.