IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v29y1970i3p241-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Issue‐Analysis Approach to Community Power: A Case Study of Realtors in Kalamazoo

Author

Listed:
  • Donald H. Bouma

Abstract

Utilizing primarily the issue‐analysis method and incidentally the reputational method an assessment is made of certain aspects of social power in a midwestern community. Although a housing proposal had the support of almost every organization in the community, voters rejected it because the real estate board was the key influential in the decision‐making process. Respondents clearly saw a self‐interest motivation on the part of the realtors but nonetheless identified with them. Neither republicans nor Democrats voted in accordance with the recommendations of their organizations, church members rejected the advice of religious groups, and union members did not follows the urging of the unions. The validity of the reputational method of determining social power is questioned since respondents generally did not identify the real estate board as an influential group in determining community decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald H. Bouma, 1970. "The Issue‐Analysis Approach to Community Power: A Case Study of Realtors in Kalamazoo," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 241-252, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:29:y:1970:i:3:p:241-252
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1970.tb03310.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1970.tb03310.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1970.tb03310.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:29:y:1970:i:3:p:241-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.