IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v70y2026i3p765-780.html

Environmental Total Factor Productivity and the Cost‐Effectiveness of GHG Emission Reduction: The Case of Crop Production in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Liu
  • Maria Vrachioli
  • Johannes Sauer

Abstract

China's diversified agricultural policies have effectively improved both the yield and environmental performance of the crop sector. Quantifying productivity trends and their drivers is key to formulating strategies for high‐quality and low‐carbon crop development. This study uses input–output panel data of crop products to examine changes in the environmental total factor productivity (ETFP) of the crop sector and its major sub‐sectors across 30 Chinese provinces from 2001 to 2020. The results show that the ETFP of the crop sector exhibited a wavelike growth pattern, mainly driven by technological progress. In addition, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can significantly improve the ETFP and shows considerable potential. Over the entire study period, the crop sector could mitigate up to 35.5% of GHG emissions to reach the frontier target value. The average marginal abatement cost is 4106 yuan/tonne CO2e. Spatially, the GHG emission mitigation potential and cost‐effectiveness in the western and central regions are higher than those in the eastern region. Therefore, inter‐regional cooperation can leverage regional differences to optimise total reduction costs and establish a carbon market, which would positively impact both the crop economy and the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Liu & Maria Vrachioli & Johannes Sauer, 2026. "Environmental Total Factor Productivity and the Cost‐Effectiveness of GHG Emission Reduction: The Case of Crop Production in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 70(3), pages 765-780, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:70:y:2026:i:3:p:765-780
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.70067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70067
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8489.70067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:70:y:2026:i:3:p:765-780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.