Author
Listed:
- John Helming
- Elisa Bardazzi
- David Schaefer
- Hugo Scherer
- Zuzana Smeets Kristkova
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the micro‐ and macro‐outcomes for the standard neoclassical carbon tax (whose burden falls on the producers) versus the implication of a budget neutral, performance‐based EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) focusing on non‐CO2 emission (N2O and CH4, measured in CO2eq) reduction, especially in the livestock sector. The subsidy is budget neutral as financed via the current basic payment of the first pillar of the CAP. The policies are applied to the single farm level model FarmDyn to take into account heterogeneity between farms and regions and the macro model MAGNET to take into account market feedback and possible leakage effects. Farm level mitigation potentials and costs from FarmDyn are used to calibrate the EU27 national milk production Marginal Abatement Costs Curves (MACCs) in MAGNET. On the other hand, scenario‐specific changes in prices of agricultural inputs and output from MAGNET are used as input in FarmDyn, improving the consistency of the modelling framework. The results of the simulations conducted in this framework show clear conclusions. On the one hand, imposing a standard carbon tax on non‐CO2 emissions in the agricultural sector is the most effective method to achieve a greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction as the carbon tax can lead to significant reduction of total agricultural GHG emissions (MAGNET). Nevertheless, this result is connected to several trade‐offs, such as farm income losses in the short term (FarmDyn) and losses in agricultural production and employment (different by country in the EU27) in the somewhat longer term (MAGNET). On the other hand, subsidising the emission abatement costs allows for mitigating almost completely the negative trade‐offs while still allowing a substantial reduction of agricultural emissions. However, subsidies easily result in overcompensation and increased prices of inputs and technologies that mitigate emissions.
Suggested Citation
John Helming & Elisa Bardazzi & David Schaefer & Hugo Scherer & Zuzana Smeets Kristkova, 2026.
"Policy Evaluation for Climate Mitigations in the European Agricultural Sector—A Comparison of Policy Options at Micro and Macro Level,"
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 70(3), pages 625-641, July.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:70:y:2026:i:3:p:625-641
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.70068
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:70:y:2026:i:3:p:625-641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.