IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v70y2026i2p352-362.html

A Small Act Towards Circular Bioeconomy: Adoption of Integrated Crop‐Livestock System and Its Impacts on Fertiliser Use

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyun Zheng
  • Wanglin Ma
  • Dil Bahadur Rahut
  • Liangang Zhang
  • Xiaoshi Zhou

Abstract

The integrated crop‐livestock system (ICLS) involves rural households simultaneously engaging in crop cultivation and livestock rearing, embodying the principles of a circular bioeconomy. In this system, crop cultivation produces straw as livestock feed, while livestock rearing generates manure that enriches the soil for crop production. This small‐scale circular model enables farmers to efficiently utilise renewable natural resources, such as crop residues and livestock waste, as sustainable alternatives to non‐renewable, fossil‐based inputs like chemical fertiliser. This paper analyses rice farmers' adoption of ICLS and its impact on fertiliser use using data collected from rural China. This study employs probit two‐stage least squares and the endogenous treatment effect model to address the endogeneity of ICLS adoption. The results indicate that ICLS adoption significantly increases expenditure and application frequency of bio‐fertiliser, while its impact on chemical fertiliser use is insignificant, though negative. The negative effect of ICLS adoption on chemical fertiliser use is only observed among young farmers. ICLS adoption is correlated with an increase in farm revenue. These findings suggest that reducing chemical fertiliser use and increasing bio‐fertiliser use, facilitated by ICLS adoption, do not compromise food security and contribute to the transition towards a circular bioeconomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyun Zheng & Wanglin Ma & Dil Bahadur Rahut & Liangang Zhang & Xiaoshi Zhou, 2026. "A Small Act Towards Circular Bioeconomy: Adoption of Integrated Crop‐Livestock System and Its Impacts on Fertiliser Use," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 70(2), pages 352-362, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:70:y:2026:i:2:p:352-362
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.70094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70094
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8489.70094?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:70:y:2026:i:2:p:352-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.