IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajarec/v69y2025i2p383-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential opportunity of add‐on service values in farmers' markets—A best–worst scaling method

Author

Listed:
  • Lintang Wardyani
  • Shuay‐Tsyr Ho
  • Kiyokazu Ujiie
  • Shang‐Ho Yang

Abstract

Farmers' markets (FMs) are a key marketing channel for farmers, and various new service values, such as providing vegetable and fruit boxes, emerged during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Thus, identifying which service values take precedence for consumers is essential. This study used the best–worst scaling method to explore FM service values. A total of 881 valid FM consumer samples were collected. Mixed multinomial logit analysis and a latent class multinomial logit model were employed to identify segments of FM consumers on the basis of their prioritisation of FM service values. The results revealed that the three most highly prioritised service values in FMs are product freshness, food safety certification and reasonable pricing. The FM consumer respondents were categorised into three major groups: price conscious, food safety conscious and community supporter groups. Community supporters accounted for approximately 54% of the respondents. This study confirmed that leafy, squashes as well as root and tuber vegetables were the three preferred agricultural product categories among the FM consumers who prioritised the ‘providing vegetable and fruit boxes’ service value.

Suggested Citation

  • Lintang Wardyani & Shuay‐Tsyr Ho & Kiyokazu Ujiie & Shang‐Ho Yang, 2025. "The potential opportunity of add‐on service values in farmers' markets—A best–worst scaling method," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(2), pages 383-404, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:69:y:2025:i:2:p:383-404
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12597
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-8489.12597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajarec:v:69:y:2025:i:2:p:383-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.