IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v66y2026i2p2039-2060.html

Revisiting the concept of the public interest in accounting: A stakeholder analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Dellaportas
  • Sophia Ji
  • Pavithra Siriwardhane
  • Dudu Luo

Abstract

This study contributes to the discussion on the meaning and operation of the public interest. The all‐inclusive perspective in defining the public interest adopted by IFAC, was criticised by stakeholders, predominantly professional bodies, for being broad and impractical. IFAC responded by proposing a process‐oriented approach to simplify the definition and assessment of public interest policies and actions. The limitations in understanding the public interest from both conceptual and practical perspectives have not been addressed in a significant way, suggesting there is room for further guidance on the meaning of the public interest and how to implement it.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Dellaportas & Sophia Ji & Pavithra Siriwardhane & Dudu Luo, 2026. "Revisiting the concept of the public interest in accounting: A stakeholder analysis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(2), pages 2039-2060, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:2039-2060
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.13236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13236
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.13236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2020. "Protecting the public interest? Continuing professional development policies and role-profession conflict in accountancy," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    2. Parker, Lee D., 1994. "Professional accounting body ethics: In search of the private interest," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 507-525, August.
    3. Mary Canning & Brendan O'Dwyer, 2001. "Professional accounting bodies' disciplinary procedures: accountable, transparent and in the public interest?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 725-749.
    4. Ballantine, Joan & Kelly, Martin & Larres, Patricia, 2020. "Banking for the common good: A Lonerganian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    5. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570110381088 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570510620484 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Willmott, Hugh, 1986. "Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the U.K," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 555-580, October.
    8. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570710731218 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579410058201 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513578910132286 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Pauline Weetman, 2001. "Controlling the standard‐setting agenda: the role of FRS 3," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 85-109, March.
    12. Walter Masocha & Pauline Weetman, 2007. "Rhetoric in standard setting: the case of the going‐concern audit," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 74-100, March.
    13. Annette Quayle, 2021. "Whistleblowing and accounting for the public interest: a call for new directions," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(7), pages 1555-1580, July.
    14. Prem Sikka & Hugh Willmott & Tony Lowe, 1989. "Guardians of Knowledge and Public Interest: Evidence and Issues of Accountability in the UK Accountancy Profession," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(2), pages 1-1, August.
    15. John Burns & Stephen Jollands, 2020. "Acting in the public interest: accounting for the vulnerable," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 507-534, July.
    16. Irene Tutticci & Keitha Dunstan & Scott Holmes, 1994. "Respondent Lobbying in the Australian Accounting Standard‐setting Process," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 86-104, June.
    17. Cooper, David J. & Robson, Keith, 2006. "Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 415-444.
    18. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-05-2020-4554 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Frémeaux, Sandrine & Puyou, François-Régis & Michelson, Grant, 2020. "Beyond accountants as technocrats: A common good perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    20. O’Regan, Philip & Killian, Sheila, 2014. "‘Professionals who understand’: Expertise, public interest and societal risk governance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 615-631.
    21. Laura Davenport & Steven Dellaportas, 2009. "Interpreting the Public Interest: A Survey of Professional Accountants," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(1), pages 11-23, March.
    22. Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2012. "Whose rights? Professional discipline and the incorporation of a (human) rights framework: The case of ICAS," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 17-35.
    23. Dellaportas, Steven & Davenport, Laura, 2008. "Reflections on the public interest in accounting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(7), pages 1080-1098.
    24. Walter Masocha & Pauline Weetman, 2007. "Rhetoric in standard setting: the case of the going‐concern audit," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 74-100, March.
    25. Sutton, Timothy G., 1984. "Lobbying of accounting standard-setting bodies in the U.K. and the U.S.A.: A Downsian analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 81-95, January.
    26. Norio Sawabe, 2005. "Accounting for the public interest: a Japanese perspective," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(5), pages 631-647, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeff Everett & Constance Friesen & Dean Neu & Abu Shiraz Rahaman, 2018. "We Have Never Been Secular: Religious Identities, Duties, and Ethics in Audit Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1121-1142, December.
    2. Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2020. "Protecting the public interest? Continuing professional development policies and role-profession conflict in accountancy," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    3. Antonelli, Valerio & D'Alessio, Raffaele & Lauri, Lucia & Marcello, Raffaele, 2024. "Professional bodies and professional closure strategies: The field of auditing for small and medium-sized enterprises in Italy☆," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2012. "Whose rights? Professional discipline and the incorporation of a (human) rights framework: The case of ICAS," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 17-35.
    5. J. Gregory Jenkins & Velina Popova & Mark D. Sheldon, 2018. "In Support of Public or Private Interests? An Examination of Sanctions Imposed Under the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 523-549, October.
    6. Laura Davenport & Steven Dellaportas, 2009. "Interpreting the Public Interest: A Survey of Professional Accountants," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 19(1), pages 11-23, March.
    7. Ballantine, Joan & Kelly, Martin & Larres, Patricia, 2020. "Banking for the common good: A Lonerganian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 67.
    8. Nieves Carrera & Nieves Gómez‐Aguilar & Christopher Humphrey & Emiliano Ruiz‐Barbadillo, 2007. "Mandatory audit firm rotation in Spain: a policy that was never applied," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(5), pages 671-701, September.
    9. Everett, Jeff & Shiraz Rahaman, Abu & Neu, Dean & Saxton, Gregory, 2024. "Letters to the editor, institutional experimentation, and the public accounting professional," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. AnnMarie Bennett & Breda Murphy, 2017. "The Tax Profession: Tax Avoidance and the Public Interest," Economics Department Working Paper Series n286-17.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    11. Mary Canning & Brendan O'Dwyer, 2006. "The influence of the “organisation” on the logics of action-pervading disciplinary decision making: The case of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland (ICAI)," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 19(1), pages 17-46, January.
    12. Dunne, Neil J. & Brennan, Niamh M. & Kirwan, Collette E., 2025. "Uncovering the nature of framing: The Big Four audit firms versus a competition regulator," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Saeed Askary & Marc Olynyk, 2006. "Public Interest, Ethics, and the Balanced Scorecard: Implications for the Accounting Profession," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(38), pages 51-58, March.
    14. Lisa Baudot & Robin W. Roberts & Dana M. Wallace, 2017. "An Examination of the U.S. Public Accounting Profession’s Public Interest Discourse and Actions in Federal Policy Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 203-220, May.
    15. Stenka, Renata & Jaworska, Sylvia, 2019. "The use of made-up users," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    16. Brendan O'Dwyer & Mary Canning, 2008. "On professional accounting body complaints procedures," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(5), pages 645-670, June.
    17. Hoffmann, Sebastian, 2025. "The role and power of technical staff in international accounting standard setting," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    18. Ariela Caglio & Mara Cameran, 2017. "Is it Shameful to be an Accountant? GenMe Perception(s) of Accountants' Ethics," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 53(1), pages 1-27, March.
    19. Carrington, Thomas, 2010. "An analysis of the demands on a sufficient audit: Professional appearance is what counts!," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 669-682.
    20. Rouba Chantiri-Chaudemanche, 2012. "Quand Normalisation Comptable Et Rhetorique Font Bon Menage ... Un Essai D'Organisation De La Litterature," Post-Print hal-00936631, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:2039-2060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.