IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v66y2026i2p2039-2060.html

Revisiting the concept of the public interest in accounting: A stakeholder analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Dellaportas
  • Sophia Ji
  • Pavithra Siriwardhane
  • Dudu Luo

Abstract

This study contributes to the discussion on the meaning and operation of the public interest. The all‐inclusive perspective in defining the public interest adopted by IFAC, was criticised by stakeholders, predominantly professional bodies, for being broad and impractical. IFAC responded by proposing a process‐oriented approach to simplify the definition and assessment of public interest policies and actions. The limitations in understanding the public interest from both conceptual and practical perspectives have not been addressed in a significant way, suggesting there is room for further guidance on the meaning of the public interest and how to implement it.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Dellaportas & Sophia Ji & Pavithra Siriwardhane & Dudu Luo, 2026. "Revisiting the concept of the public interest in accounting: A stakeholder analysis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(2), pages 2039-2060, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:2039-2060
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.13236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13236
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.13236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:2039-2060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.