IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v66y2026i2p1643-1671.html

Chain Independent Directors and Innovation Knowledge Spillover: Evidence From Patent Citation

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Zhang
  • Chun Yuan
  • Jenny Jing Wang

Abstract

China's socialist modernization has entered a new development stage, where high‐quality economic development cannot be achieved without firms’ high‐level technological innovation (In National Science and Technology Conference, National Science and Technology Awards Conference, the 21st Academician Conference of Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the 17th Academician Conference of Chinese Academy of Engineering. The General Secretary emphasised that Chinas modernization must be underpinned by scientific and technological modernization, high‐quality development relies on new growth engines by scientific and technological innovation. We must fully recognise the strategic leading position and fundamental supporting role of science and technology, anchor the strategic goal of building China into a country strong in science and technology by 2035, accelerate high‐level self‐reliance and self‐strength in science and technology.). However, the increasing complexity and shorter innovation cycles make it hard for individual companies to meet all requirements, resulting in an increased reliance on external resources. Despite China's enterprises boost innovation investments annually (The National Bureau of Statistics released ‘Statistical Communiqué of the Peoples Republic of China on the 2024 National Economic and Social Development’. Regarding innovation, Chinas annual R&D expenditure rose from 2.4393 trillion to 3.613 trillion yuan over 5 years, with consistent growth above 8%.), their knowledge spillover level among innovation entities still lags far behind the world's advanced economies (Source: China Merchants Securities, ‘Comparison and Recommendations of R&D Incentive Policies in China and the U.S.—Part of Sino‐US Comparison Series Report (0711).’). Relatively low innovation spillovers hinder knowledge sharing and learning, which is not conducive to breaking the dependence on core technologies. Therefore, improving technological resources sharing, guiding knowledge flow across different innovation entities and achieving the transformation of learning‐imitation‐reinvention are crucial for advancing national self‐reliance and self‐improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Zhang & Chun Yuan & Jenny Jing Wang, 2026. "Chain Independent Directors and Innovation Knowledge Spillover: Evidence From Patent Citation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(2), pages 1643-1671, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:1643-1671
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.70170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70170
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.70170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larcker, David F. & So, Eric C. & Wang, Charles C.Y., 2013. "Boardroom centrality and firm performance," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 225-250.
    2. Dong, Xiaofang & Zheng, Siqi & Kahn, Matthew E., 2020. "The role of transportation speed in facilitating high skilled teamwork across cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Stephen P. Ferris & Murali Jagannathan & A. C. Pritchard, 2003. "Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(3), pages 1087-1111, June.
    4. Sterling Huang & Gilles Hilary, 2018. "Zombie Board: Board Tenure and Firm Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(4), pages 1285-1329, September.
    5. Ajay Agrawal & Avi Goldfarb, 2008. "Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Innovation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1578-1590, September.
    6. Charlot, Sylvie & Duranton, Gilles, 2004. "Communication externalities in cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 581-613, November.
    7. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Agency Problems and Residual Claims," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 327-349, June.
    8. Cashman, George D. & Gillan, Stuart L. & Jun, Chulhee, 2012. "Going overboard? On busy directors and firm value," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3248-3259.
    9. Lane, Philip R. & Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria, 2001. "The external wealth of nations: measures of foreign assets and liabilities for industrial and developing countries," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 263-294, December.
    10. Caroline Hussler, 2004. "Culture and knowledge spillovers in Europe : new perspectives for innovation and convergence policies ?," Post-Print hal-00278985, HAL.
    11. Meric S. Gertler, 2003. "Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there)," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 75-99, January.
    12. Chakravarty, Sugato & Rutherford, Leann G., 2017. "Do busy directors influence the cost of debt? An examination through the lens of takeover vulnerability," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 429-443.
    13. Caroline Hussler, 2004. "Culture and knowledge spillovers in Europe: New perspectives for innovation and convergence policies?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 523-541.
    14. James Heckman, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    15. Criscuolo, Paola & Verspagen, Bart, 2008. "Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1892-1908, December.
    16. repec:bla:jfinan:v:58:y:2003:i:3:p:1087-1112 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Bottazzi, Laura & Peri, Giovanni, 2003. "Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 687-710, August.
    18. James D. Adams, 2002. "Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 253-278, July.
    19. Lecce, Giampaolo & Ogliari, Laura, 2019. "Institutional Transplant and Cultural Proximity: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Prussia," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(4), pages 1060-1093, December.
    20. Sharon Belenzon & Mark Schankerman, 2013. "Spreading the Word: Geography, Policy, and Knowledge Spillovers," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(3), pages 884-903, July.
    21. Wolfgang Keller, 2002. "Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(1), pages 120-142, March.
    22. Adam B. Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg & Rebecca Henderson, 1993. "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(3), pages 577-598.
    23. Zhang, Ke & Wang, Jenny Jing & Rao, Bin & Jiang, Heng & Ding, Xiaolin, 2025. "Urban economic coordination committee and coordinated development of regional innovation: A knowledge spillover perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(PA).
    24. Ke Zhang & Jenny Jing Wang & Yanqi Sun & Sarowar Hossain, 2021. "Financial slack, institutional shareholding and enterprise innovation investment: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 3235-3259, June.
    25. Tim Martens & Christoph J. Sextroh, 2021. "Analyst Coverage Overlaps and Interfirm Information Spillovers," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 59(4), pages 1425-1480, September.
    26. Oyelola A. Adegboye & Denis H. Y. Leung & You‐Gan Wang, 2018. "Analysis of spatial data with a nested correlation structure," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 329-354, February.
    27. Timothy G. Conley & Christopher R. Udry, 2010. "Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 35-69, March.
    28. Agrawal, Ajay & Kapur, Devesh & McHale, John, 2008. "How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 258-269, September.
    29. Giovanni Peri, 2005. "Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 87(2), pages 308-322, May.
    30. Badertscher, Brad & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal D., 2013. "Externalities of public firm presence: Evidence from private firms' investment decisions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 682-706.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Ke & Pan, Shuang & Wang, JennyJing & Ding, Xiaolin, 2025. "Officials geographical rotation, knowledge spillovers and coordinated development of regional innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 327-351.
    2. Zhang, Ke & Wang, Jenny Jing & Rao, Bin & Jiang, Heng & Ding, Xiaolin, 2025. "Urban economic coordination committee and coordinated development of regional innovation: A knowledge spillover perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(PA).
    3. Zaizhou Hu & Zengdong Cao & Anran Du & Qin Tu, 2025. "Where does it matter? Revisiting the role of proximity in knowledge spillovers," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(2), pages 297-322, March.
    4. Long, Cheryl Xiaoning & Yi, Wei, 2024. "Information effects of high-speed rail: Evidence from patent citations in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    5. Keith Head & Yao Amber Li & Asier Minondo, 2019. "Geography, Ties, and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Citations in Mathematics," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(4), pages 713-727, October.
    6. Nivedita Mukherji & Jonathan Silberman, 2021. "Knowledge flows between universities and industry: the impact of distance, technological compatibility, and the ability to diffuse knowledge," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 223-257, February.
    7. Siwei Cao & Guangrong Ma & Hao Mao, 2024. "Is distance really dying? Transportation and knowledge spillovers," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 355-405, March.
    8. Wang, Xiaoquan & Wu, Qi & Zhang, Hong, 2025. "The role of social ties in spreading innovation: Evidence from alien merchant guilds in China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    9. Jan Fagerberg & Maryann Feldman & Martin Srholec, 2011. "Technological Dynamics and Social Capability: Comparing U.S. States and European Nations," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20111114, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    10. Emanuele Bacchiocchi & Fabio Montobbio, 2010. "International Knowledge Diffusion and Home‐bias Effect: Do USPTO and EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 112(3), pages 441-470, September.
    11. Melinda Cahyaning Ratri & Iman Harymawan & Khairul Anuar Kamarudin, 2021. "Busyness, Tenure, Meeting Frequency of the CEOs, and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Maximilian Goethner & Michael Wyrwich, 2020. "Cross-faculty proximity and academic entrepreneurship: the role of business schools," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1016-1062, August.
    13. Drivas, Kyriakos & Economidou, Claire & Karkalakos, Sotiris & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2016. "Mobility of knowledge and local innovation activity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 39-61.
    14. Henrique Castro Martins & Cristiano Machado Costa, 2020. "Does control concentration affect board busyness? International evidence," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 821-850, September.
    15. Elif Bascavusoglu-Moreau & Qian Cher Li, 2013. "Knowledge Spillovers & Sources of Knowledge in the Manufacturing Sector: Literature Review & Empirical Evidence for the UK," Working Papers wp451, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    16. Carlo Giglio & Roberto Sbragia & Roberto Musmanno & Roberto Palmieri, 2021. "Cross-country learning from patents: an analysis of citations flows in innovation trajectories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7917-7936, September.
    17. Carlo Giglio & Gianluca Salvatore Vocaturo & Roberto Palmieri, 2023. "Patent Acquisitions in the Healthcare Industry: An Analysis of Learning Mechanisms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, February.
    18. Elvira Cerver-Romero & João J. Ferreira & Cristina Fernandes, 2020. "A scientometric analysis of knowledge spillover research," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 780-805, June.
    19. Wiljan van den Berge & Jonneke Bolhaar & Roel van Elk, 2017. "Knowledge diffusion across regions and countries: evidence from patent citations," CPB Discussion Paper 348, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    20. Autant-Bernard, Corinne & Fadairo, Muriel & Massard, Nadine, 2013. "Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 196-210.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:2:p:1643-1671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.