IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v66y2026i1p657-694.html

Curbing Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Greenwashing Through Centralisation of Environmental Monitoring: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Jinli Wang
  • Qiyong Xiao
  • Xin Han

Abstract

The potential impact of environmental regulatory system reform on corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) greenwashing remains to be further explored. Using China's 2017 environmental system reform as a quasi‐natural experiment, this study examines the impact of monitoring authority reclaim on corporate ESG greenwashing. Our findings show that recentralising environmental monitoring significantly curbs ESG greenwashing, and we document a sizable negative association between ESG greenwashing and a shift towards cleaner air quality. However, the inhibitory effect of the reform is diminishing with the increase in monitoring distance from the business to the nearest monitoring station. Further investigation indicates that the inhibitory effect is particularly pronounced in state‐owned, pollution‐intensive, low‐tech firms and those with tight financing constraints. Mechanism analysis suggests that monitoring centralisation deters ESG greenwashing by strengthening environmental governance and promoting citizen participation in environmental protection. Overall, this study highlights the effectiveness of centralisation in sustainability and underscores the need for an appropriate environmental monitoring system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinli Wang & Qiyong Xiao & Xin Han, 2026. "Curbing Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Greenwashing Through Centralisation of Environmental Monitoring: Evidence From China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(1), pages 657-694, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:1:p:657-694
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.70103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.70103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:1:p:657-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.