IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/acctfi/v66y2026i1p48-79.html

Is Corporate Bond Market (In)attentive to Earnings News on Busy Reporting Days?

Author

Listed:
  • Xi (Novia) Chen
  • Peng‐Chia Chiu
  • Qin Li
  • Po‐Hsiang Yu

Abstract

This study explores investor attention in the corporate bond market, which is largely dominated by institutional investors. Specifically, we examine how bond investors respond to earnings news when faced with competing signals. Analysing both contemporaneous and subsequent bond returns, we find that bond price reactions to earnings announcements are not attenuated on busy reporting days and that there is no evidence of return continuation or reversal in the post‐announcement window. These findings are robust to alternative proxies for limited investor attention and suggest that bond investors, on average, remain attentive to earnings news even on busy reporting days. Cross‐sectional analyses indicate that bond investors' reliance on private information may help explain why they are not distracted by competing earnings signals. Collectively, our results suggest that bond investors are less constrained by limited attention than previously thought.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi (Novia) Chen & Peng‐Chia Chiu & Qin Li & Po‐Hsiang Yu, 2026. "Is Corporate Bond Market (In)attentive to Earnings News on Busy Reporting Days?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 66(1), pages 48-79, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:1:p:48-79
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.70101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70101
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/acfi.70101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chordia, Tarun & Goyal, Amit & Nozawa, Yoshio & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar & Tong, Qing, 2017. "Are Capital Market Anomalies Common to Equity and Corporate Bond Markets? An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 1301-1342, August.
    2. Hirshleifer, David & Sheng, Jinfei, 2022. "Macro news and micro news: Complements or substitutes?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 1006-1024.
    3. Edith S. Hotchkiss & Tavy Ronen, 2002. "The Informational Efficiency of the Corporate Bond Market: An Intraday Analysis," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 15(5), pages 1325-1354.
    4. Gebhardt, William R. & Hvidkjaer, Soeren & Swaminathan, Bhaskaran, 2005. "Stock and bond market interaction: Does momentum spill over?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 651-690, March.
    5. Azi Ben-Rephael & Zhi Da & Ryan D. Israelsen, 2017. "It Depends on Where You Search: Institutional Investor Attention and Underreaction to News," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(9), pages 3009-3047.
    6. Raphael Schestag & Philipp Schuster & Marliese Uhrig-Homburg, 2016. "Measuring Liquidity in Bond Markets," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 29(5), pages 1170-1219.
    7. Lei Feng & Mark Seasholes, 2005. "Do Investor Sophistication and Trading Experience Eliminate Behavioral Biases in Financial Markets?," Review of Finance, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 305-351, September.
    8. Cornaggia, Kimberly & Hund, John & Nguyen, Giang, 2022. "Investor attention and municipal bond returns," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Shane A. Corwin & Jay F. Coughenour, 2008. "Limited Attention and the Allocation of Effort in Securities Trading," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(6), pages 3031-3067, December.
    10. Klakow Akepanidtaworn & Rick Di Mascio & Alex Imas & Lawrence D.W. Schmidt, 2023. "Selling Fast and Buying Slow: Heuristics and Trading Performance of Institutional Investors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(6), pages 3055-3098, December.
    11. Paul C. Tetlock, 2011. "All the News That's Fit to Reprint: Do Investors React to Stale Information?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(5), pages 1481-1512.
    12. Mark L. Defond & Jieying Zhang, 2014. "The Timeliness of the Bond Market Reaction to Bad Earnings News," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 911-936, September.
    13. Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2003. "Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 337-386, December.
    14. Chen, Long & Zhang, Gaiyan & Zhang, Weina, 2016. "Return predictability in the corporate bond market along the supply chain," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 66-86.
    15. Marcin Kacperczyk & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh & Laura Veldkamp, 2016. "A Rational Theory of Mutual Funds' Attention Allocation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 571-626, March.
    16. Michaely, Roni & Rubin, Amir & Vedrashko, Alexander, 2016. "Are Friday announcements special? Overcoming selection bias," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 65-85.
    17. John A. List, 2003. "Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 41-71.
    18. David Hirshleifer & Sonya Seongyeon Lim & Siew Hong Teoh, 2009. "Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and Underreaction to Earnings News," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(5), pages 2289-2325, October.
    19. Lei Feng & Mark S. Seasholes, 2005. "Do Investor Sophistication and Trading Experience Eliminate Behavioral Biases in Financial Markets?," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 9(3), pages 305-351.
    20. Reto Foellmi & Stefan Legge & Lukas Schmid, 2016. "Do Professionals Get It Right? Limited Attention and Risk‐taking Behaviour," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(592), pages 724-755, May.
    21. Sanjeev Bhojraj & Bhaskaran Swaminathan, 2009. "How does the corporate bond market value capital investments and accruals?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 31-62, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jiacui, 2022. "Endogenous inattention and risk-specific price underreaction in corporate bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 595-615.
    2. Umar, Tarik, 2022. "Complexity aversion when SeekingAlpha," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    3. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    4. Alan Crane & Kevin Crotty & Tarik Umar, 2023. "Hedge Funds and Public Information Acquisition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3241-3262, June.
    5. Chen, Linda H. & Jiang, George J. & Zhu, Kevin X., 2018. "Total attention: The effect of macroeconomic news on market reaction to earnings news," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 142-156.
    6. Ahmad, Fawad & Oriani, Raffaele, 2022. "Investor attention, information acquisition, and value premium: A mispricing perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Verhoeks, Ralph C. & Verschoor, Willem F.C. & Zwinkels, Remco C.J., 2025. "Investor attention and stock markets dynamics: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    8. Zhi Da & Jian Hua & Tim Chih-Ching Hung & Lin Peng, 2025. "Market Returns and a Tale of Two Types of Attention," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(12), pages 10505-10537, December.
    9. Mugerman, Yevgeny & Steinberg, Nadav & Wiener, Zvi, 2022. "The exclamation mark of Cain: Risk salience and mutual fund flows," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    10. Doron Israeli & Ron Kasznik & Suhas A. Sridharan, 2022. "Unexpected distractions and investor attention to corporate announcements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 477-518, June.
    11. Brian Gibbons & Peter Iliev & Jonathan Kalodimos, 2021. "Analyst Information Acquisition via EDGAR," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 769-793, February.
    12. Guomei Tang & Xueyong Zhang, 2021. "Media attention to locations and the cross‐section of stock returns," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2301-2336, April.
    13. Arnold, Marc & Pelster, Matthias & Subrahmanyam, Marti G., 2022. "Attention triggers and investors’ risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 846-875.
    14. Nicole Thorne Jenkins & Michael D. Kimbrough & Juan Wang, 2016. "The extent of informational efficiency in the credit default swap market: evidence from post-earnings announcement returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 725-761, May.
    15. Li, Tao & Xiang, Cheng & Liu, Zhuo & Cai, Wenwu, 2020. "Annual report disclosure timing and stock price crash risk," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Cai, Qiuye & Yung, Kenneth, 2024. "Retail attention on earnings announcement days: Evidence from social media," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    17. Vicente Cuñat & Moqi Groen-Xu, 2025. "Timing Complex News to Target Attention," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7774-7799, September.
    18. Joon Woo Bae & Zhi Da & Virgilio Zurita, 2024. "Digesting FOREXS: Information Transmission Across Asset Classes and Return Predictability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(3), pages 1943-1969, March.
    19. Duan, Xinrui & Guo, Li & Li, Frank Weikai & Tu, Jun, 2025. "Do factor models capture both sentiment and limited attention?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    20. Wang, Hailong & Hu, Duni, 2025. "Heterogeneous beliefs with information processing constraints and asset pricing in presence of non-tradable goods," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:66:y:2026:i:1:p:48-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaanzea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.