IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are all dividends created equal? Australian evidence using dividend‐increase track records


  • David Michayluk
  • Karyn Neuhauser
  • Scott Walker


Recent research indicates that the signal sent by a dividend change is more powerful for longer histories of unchanged dividends. We study the dividend history of Australian firms to investigate whether the signalling power of a dividend increase varies with the frequency of repetition. We find that the first three consecutive dividend increases are associated with significantly positive abnormal returns, and subsequent increases are generally not significant, even after controlling for the interaction effect with the simultaneously announced earnings information. Our results support the hypothesis that repeating a dividend increase eventually leads to a reputation for further increases and weakens the value of subsequent increases as a means of disseminating management's private information.

Suggested Citation

  • David Michayluk & Karyn Neuhauser & Scott Walker, 2019. "Are all dividends created equal? Australian evidence using dividend‐increase track records," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2621-2643, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:59:y:2019:i:4:p:2621-2643
    DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12303

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Yoonsoo Nam & Scott J Niblock & Elisabeth Sinnewe & Keith Jakob, 2018. "Do corporate directors ‘heap’ dividends? Evidence on dividend rounding and information uncertainty in Australian firms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(3), pages 421-438, August.
    2. Michael Dempsey & Abeyratna Gunasekarage & Thanh Tan Truong, 2019. "The association between dividend payout and firm growth: Australian evidence," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(4), pages 2345-2376, December.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:acctfi:v:59:y:2019:i:4:p:2621-2643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley Content Delivery). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.