IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v62y2026i3p673-697.html

Exploring the Materiality of Data Breach Disclosures on the Australian Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Andrew
  • Max Baker
  • Xiaojiao Wang
  • Monique Sheehan

Abstract

This study examines Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) data breach announcements to provide insights into the extent and nature of data breach disclosures, as well as the costs, particularly to stakeholder relationships. Using a dataset of all data breach‐related announcements on the ASX, we identify a lack of data breach disclosure and, where disclosures are made, a notable absence of detail. To examine how the concept of materiality is applied, given its role as a threshold for disclosure to stock markets globally, we provide an in‐depth examination of the case of Landmark White (LMW), the only company to disclose a material impact from its data breaches to the ASX. We identify an announcement paradox, where the data breach at LMW became material over time as stakeholders reacted to the announcements, pointing to a contagion effect. We recommend the creation of likely‐market‐effect models, which allow companies to calculate the likely share price impact of a data breach and use this in their decision to disclose. This approach represents a simple first step in reconceptualizing continuous disclosure regimes for the digital age, aimed at enhancing the transparency and reporting of cyber incidents to stock markets globally.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Andrew & Max Baker & Xiaojiao Wang & Monique Sheehan, 2026. "Exploring the Materiality of Data Breach Disclosures on the Australian Stock Exchange," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 62(3), pages 673-697, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:62:y:2026:i:3:p:673-697
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.70001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.70001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.70001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:62:y:2026:i:3:p:673-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.