IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v62y2026i2p422-468.html

Does Financial Statement Comparability Reduce Differences in Sentiment‐induced Investor Trading Behaviour?

Author

Listed:
  • Eun Hye Jo
  • Jung Wha (Jenny) Lee

Abstract

This study examines whether comparable financial information can mitigate differences between individual and institutional investors’ trading behaviour, particularly behaviour that is shaped by investor sentiment. The results indicate that the higher the comparability, the smaller the gap in trading behaviour driven by investor sentiment between institutional and individual investors. In particular, the tendency of individual investors to purchase stocks associated with high investor sentiment is mitigated by comparable financial information. However, the study also reveals that comparability does not significantly affect institutional investors’ investment decisions. Furthermore, the effect of comparability in minimizing differences in trading behaviours resulting from investor sentiment is more pronounced for firms that are difficult to evaluate (such as young, volatile, non‐dividend‐paying firms with extreme market‐to‐book ratios, and those with limited analyst coverage) as well as firms operating in less competitive industries. Overall, these findings collectively indicate that comparability benefits investors and highlights which types of investors stand to gain from it.

Suggested Citation

  • Eun Hye Jo & Jung Wha (Jenny) Lee, 2026. "Does Financial Statement Comparability Reduce Differences in Sentiment‐induced Investor Trading Behaviour?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 62(2), pages 422-468, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:62:y:2026:i:2:p:422-468
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.12371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12371
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.12371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:62:y:2026:i:2:p:422-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.